1 Return-Path: <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56D2431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id QlvTXBktbmWz for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.212.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28C5D431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by mail-vb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fc21so1642538vbb.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date
\r
27 :message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=xgjGitM/s954rXg7O49sEKuVy9fr9xWFDJisi301wcs=;
\r
29 b=AkO9+2kAu4UdJZzZ0tEkiBd8B5LXnEouDMDxVWFSyUj2An0oS8oj1zWEDKzQ4Azs8K
\r
30 tRCCwR62iNF8Z4YiN7kVQGOY60adqi3i19hzakeBlg2cJ35yYOVp7ok2ekfjcnrpTtwd
\r
31 yZKXq+jC3DBD+EjY9SnanDHh3PQmuglA+f0gCi0U6CewNqDaGPaMsK4n8WvtUVJJt/2S
\r
32 nbOtAofseR/juF/mug6FTW3DNvvav5nXMPmbRwft5a2eOqtkbsfCb0eo6ZUC6uwRqsNP
\r
33 UWDs0bnXdQVkk4HgkTgKMEiox1suMgmuoZVhRcfUGk/XHXCkzqd/7IIekf0IYagL7UWI
\r
35 Received: by 10.52.180.5 with SMTP id dk5mr5087061vdc.45.1350749338557;
\r
36 Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
\r
37 Received: from smtp.gmail.com (p70-80.acedsl.com. [66.114.70.80])
\r
38 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id co1sm4659865vdc.10.2012.10.20.09.08.57
\r
39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
40 Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
\r
41 From: Ethan Glasser-Camp <ethan.glasser.camp@gmail.com>
\r
42 To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
43 Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] test/smtp-dummy: add --background option and
\r
45 In-Reply-To: <1347978182-8771-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
46 References: <1347978182-8771-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
47 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+45~g6ea9330 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
48 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
49 Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:08:56 -0400
\r
50 Message-ID: <87sj995dnr.fsf@betacantrips.com>
\r
52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
53 Cc: Tomi Ollila <too@iki.fi>
\r
54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
57 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
58 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
59 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
61 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
62 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
64 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
66 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 16:09:00 -0000
\r
68 Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:
\r
70 > From: Tomi Ollila <too@iki.fi>
\r
72 > When shell executes background process using '&' the scheduling of
\r
73 > that new process is arbitrary. It could be that smtp-dummy doesn't
\r
74 > get execution time to listen() it's server socket until some other
\r
75 > process attempts to connect() to it. The --background option in
\r
76 > smtp-dummy makes it to go background *after* it started to listen
\r
77 > its server socket.
\r
79 This looks fine to me, Michal Sojka's reviewed this version, and this
\r
80 patch has been bouncing around for almost a year! I'm taking off
\r