Re: [PATCH] emacs: wash: make word-wrap bound message width
[notmuch-archives.git] / 71 / 2f5a4cc811d2c27f8e27073553ab9db5474b69
1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24C1431FB6\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  2 Apr 2012 14:20:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id lXcphwEoibOk for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Mon,  2 Apr 2012 14:20:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
18         [131.215.239.19])\r
19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C4D431FAE\r
20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  2 Apr 2012 14:20:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
21 Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
22         by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DF232802D;\r
23         Mon,  2 Apr 2012 14:20:19 -0700 (PDT)\r
24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new\r
25 Received: from finestructure.net (gwave-213.ligo.caltech.edu\r
26  [131.215.114.213])     (Authenticated sender: jrollins)        by fire-doxen-submit\r
27  (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA782E50E2D;  Mon,  2 Apr 2012 14:20:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
28 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
29         id 3F4BF7F4; Mon,  2 Apr 2012 14:20:14 -0700 (PDT)\r
30 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
31 To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>\r
32 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] cli: add support for batch tagging operations to\r
33         "notmuch tag"\r
34 In-Reply-To:\r
35  <CAB+hUn_J9oOmbWaQ+_2yGG6i6ecDXbfJWYbpaYx_kbSnAH+EcA@mail.gmail.com>\r
36 References: <cover.1333231401.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
37         <f360a40bed50208d146aee8b06946b1b8315e818.1333231401.git.jani@nikula.org>\r
38         <87ty123tpc.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
39         <87aa2tc22z.fsf@zancas.localnet>\r
40         <87iphh50hz.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
41         <CAB+hUn_J9oOmbWaQ+_2yGG6i6ecDXbfJWYbpaYx_kbSnAH+EcA@mail.gmail.com>\r
42 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+87~g3c4c85f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
43         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
44 Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 14:20:11 -0700\r
45 Message-ID: <87fwcl4yr8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
46 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
47 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
48         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
49 Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
50 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
51 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
52 Precedence: list\r
53 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
54         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
55 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
56         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
57 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
58 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
59 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
60 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
61         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
62 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:20:23 -0000\r
63 \r
64 --=-=-=\r
65 \r
66 On Mon, Apr 02 2012, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:\r
67 > Batch tagging brings performance and atomicity by opening and closing the\r
68 > db only once. The hex encoding handles insane message ids and tags.\r
69 > Otherwise there should be no difference.\r
70 \r
71 I can maybe see performance in terms of opening and closing the db only\r
72 once, but atomicity?  Not sure I see how that is improved.\r
73 \r
74 And shouldn't we be able to improve the handling of command line\r
75 arguments so that we get the same encoding handling on the command line\r
76 as we would from stdin?\r
77 \r
78 jamie.\r
79 \r
80 --=-=-=\r
81 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
82 \r
83 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
84 Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
85 \r
86 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPehgLAAoJEO00zqvie6q8b28P/RdtI1iyvRos9edie7xI9QH7\r
87 y34ycGbiRI056CcYR5QKVLaTECTZRBQcVFveZSAX6Qi3WRbs/gde9owLU52bh/gg\r
88 993RKA34EVXIzoZcdhOFmrNkK3py44r+Sq+wsE4VYLjtZmzcRLncl56c2tprBhm8\r
89 kh4K8WisLz9FvoibJWn1zLkA8W/biEukF8iS+KEOeFsWee1wg6uzuz4cBC1WXdNG\r
90 fOjsQCDK2PsJhOaQu56QvKFeJCtHJFPCu+XumC6ieK8PBSbsGPHftcJLJhxtrspg\r
91 MQG01I/idabtWK3R3eAgg7HnTLV7gzPUGDCn3hTnrmDLOJ3lMuN5eTC+oSePoEGA\r
92 oEjHK5vijtFd7GNfcCO6TjAJFfO1k+mSXuYTczvqLNeZlhQ1Ei6d2kbW5ANX/1Ua\r
93 aPkx7z2XI+Jr1Bg9u9Mbnsj25O99JM/xPNfbQZXxXSXzjF6Xd3+VCk0RwTSc1cnu\r
94 beZwnBWba/wugsI9abF/y3UfF8kzbFFUlKVN7/Gy1bC7fdq/pnxSzFZREIfT3O+f\r
95 8uPtvIvcID5V6gKizX0atrw44ZPme7PpOxoLSX8/Lv/QMm+Wuc5iQeVoyt2wnM30\r
96 VqBhVr3JbmTHyAniXowhMnh9l6K+Lz7LE/CaqyMjNUIV8jqf2bHpIL2HQs5zc+Li\r
97 bq70iXjIAW3DkxzCARfq\r
98 =3/7b\r
99 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
100 --=-=-=--\r