70/1196138797ef98a6b953c2605f5eca59dedb48

   1 Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30553431FAF\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  3 Jul 2012 19:00:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
  13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id z9YbuXoMZAoX for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Tue,  3 Jul 2012 18:59:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
  18 Received: from mail-gh0-f181.google.com (mail-gh0-f181.google.com\r
  19         [209.85.160.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
  20         (No client certificate requested)\r
  21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E6D431FAE\r
  22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  3 Jul 2012 18:59:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by ghbz13 with SMTP id z13so7825188ghb.26\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:59:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
  26         h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
  27         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition\r
  28         :content-transfer-encoding;\r
  29         bh=sQPt2vi55FlsamtfihEH1v7Tl2NPoZJlZcpCIWK8drg=;\r
  30         b=eOcGgeo6TUDiTQ8IKStmjxcDe4KTFU7LY9RCRTyxam2VxMQhYk6VG0q3HuZgP/OfXC\r
  31         xeFKDMWEeito0w/8cMWSMuqiqLxe4J7h2Yn+TNJedx3TgmK4yJ0sgqcKelv8amHgul54\r
  32         /v+QoyGjxJvg/NGAL2EJWmjsGMK5IZ9u9HyiPISfTea9l0HkUCp5z3LLskTgvl2IdTOV\r
  33         BSB22B64cfxsKxwE4nKfHFD2VuRxP7QKVLzRReYoiAbIQchd+sOmUMssYvc4/wFwViR9\r
  34         jE1i8eboP23+X8OZDIRL2FMk53URVWAdtu0A+rhTty9m36KHcPRzAhATJEcpcL86tIkb\r
  35         f1LA==\r
  36 Received: by 10.68.194.201 with SMTP id hy9mr4165191pbc.69.1341367197232;\r
  37         Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:59:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
  38 Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
  39         [220.233.42.215])\r
  40         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id of1sm16662864pbb.15.2012.07.03.18.59.54\r
  41         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
  42         Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:59:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
  43 Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 11:59:51 +1000\r
  44 Message-ID: <20120704115951.GC2342@hili.localdomain>\r
  45 From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
  46 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  47 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] show: output Reply-To headers\r
  48 In-Reply-To: <87vci471tw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  49 References: <1340508470-16606-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
  50         <1340508470-16606-2-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
  51         <87vci471tw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  52 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
  54 Content-Disposition: inline\r
  55 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
  56 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  59 Precedence: list\r
  60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  61         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  63         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  68         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  69 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 02:00:01 -0000\r
  70 \r
  71 On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:27:23 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:\r
  72 > On Sat, Jun 23 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> wrote:\r
  73 > > Output Reply-To headers when present in a message.\r
  74 > > These were missing in text and json output formats.\r
  75 > \r
  76 > I don't see why the Reply-To header is needed, given that we are\r
  77 > constructing reply templates, but I guess if someone thinks it's needed\r
  78 > I don't see much harm in including it.\r
  79 \r
  80 I want to see what the sender intended, before hitting reply.\r
  81 \r
  82 Peter\r