1 Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D599D431FBF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:13:58 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.081 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=-0.096, BAYES_40=-0.185] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id nbYXMA8tvV9h; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:13:57 -0800 (PST)
\r
16 Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
17 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A40431FAE;
\r
18 Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:13:57 -0800 (PST)
\r
19 Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
20 id 160FD25427B; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:13:53 -0800 (PST)
\r
21 From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
22 To: James Vasile <james@hackervisions.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
23 In-Reply-To: <87ocjc4rsj.fsf@hackervisions.org>
\r
24 References: <87hbp5j9dv.fsf@hackervisions.org>
\r
25 <87r5o8stbj.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
26 <87ocjc4rsj.fsf@hackervisions.org>
\r
27 Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:13:52 -0800
\r
28 Message-ID: <87bpfcs6jz.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
30 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
31 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
32 Cc: Martin F Krafft <madduck@debian.org>
\r
33 Subject: Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging
\r
34 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
35 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
37 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
38 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
39 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
40 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
41 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
42 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
43 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
44 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
45 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
46 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:13:59 -0000
\r
49 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
51 > Sometimes I manually override a rule-based tag. If automatic tagging
\r
52 > operated on old messages, overrides could be superseded. When I add
\r
53 > automatic tag rules, I first execute them manually and globally from the
\r
56 Right. With my global automatic tags, I don't want to be able to
\r
57 override them, (and the fact that I *can* by adding/removing tags is a
\r
58 bug---since, as you point out, the next run of my script will destroy my
\r
59 changes). That's one of the reasons I want to switch to saved searches
\r
60 for my own use of automatic tags.
\r
62 Meanwhile, Martin has talked about having some machine-learning
\r
63 algorithm apply tags, and have it notice when the user adds/removes
\r
64 for feedback to improve its learning. So that kind of use case is
\r
65 something that definitely isn't covered by saved searches.
\r
67 > > To do my "global" searches quickly, I do a similar subsetting, but it's
\r
68 > > much simpler. If I'm adding the "notmuch" tag I do "and not
\r
69 > > tag:notmuch". We've even had the proposal of making "notmuch tag" do
\r
70 > > that automatically.
\r
72 > That sounds like a good idea. What happened with that proposal?
\r
74 Like many other proposals, it's simply waiting for someone to implement
\r
77 > Saved searches is a very good idea. I look forward to it.
\r
85 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
87 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
88 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
\r
90 iD8DBQFLh5DQ6JDdNq8qSWgRArTbAKCdLaKkf77XqO9x0D01tfo1hIlbpwCfaEpA
\r
91 ap+jle62jH1SDWyzMe1vVLQ=
\r
93 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r