6f/23b538bc8003ba9ee5787a1415e4af94037044

   1 Return-Path: <wking@tremily.us>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2292431FB6\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  6 Feb 2014 10:16:09 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.1\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
  13         RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id I4dzfHUSvhwP for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Thu,  6 Feb 2014 10:16:03 -0800 (PST)\r
  18 Received: from qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net\r
  19         (qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.56])\r
  20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEA7431FAE\r
  21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  6 Feb 2014 10:16:03 -0800 (PST)\r
  22 Received: from omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.12])\r
  23         by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast\r
  24         id P4x21n0030Fqzac566G1CK; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:16:01 +0000\r
  25 Received: from odin.tremily.us ([24.18.63.50])\r
  26         by omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast\r
  27         id P6E11n00W152l3L3U6E2WL; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:14:02 +0000\r
  28 Received: by odin.tremily.us (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
  29         id 26C63FEFFFA; Thu,  6 Feb 2014 10:14:01 -0800 (PST)\r
  30 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tremily.us; s=odin;\r
  31         t=1391710441; bh=50PCRjzwO/MRbOxK1Um8DHWRb8WlYqBl6L+VeeY1i0I=;\r
  32         h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;\r
  33         b=AhNjMPL8kpsLaTlDqu0oqJuUSC8sapOTldC+Uwv0XgUyWrNYrBmYsL//siUrZqy3L\r
  34         UiCJTV+IwMLX5R4Cr9bvNPtonC2QPXjQEvYHlbnU7Rfo0Yrb5+3CwdE92p9dIKsHSV\r
  35         TU9alA0MfoZjw8KTIhutZTY+OV3FrOH2F1vmKM5c=\r
  36 Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 10:14:01 -0800\r
  37 From: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>\r
  38 To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>\r
  39 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] nmbug-status: Python-3-compabitility and general\r
  40         refactoring\r
  41 Message-ID: <20140206181400.GP14197@odin.tremily.us>\r
  42 References: <m2ha8frjgg.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
  43         <20140204005331.GQ14197@odin.tremily.us>\r
  44         <m2fvnzp3uh.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
  45         <20140204161142.GS14197@odin.tremily.us>\r
  46         <m2a9e6zppp.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
  47         <20140204191453.GV14197@odin.tremily.us>\r
  48         <m2fvnywsly.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
  49         <m2fvnxvc2q.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
  50         <20140205152738.GJ14197@odin.tremily.us>\r
  51         <m28utp6ugv.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
  52 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  53 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;\r
  54         protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0KpsattHCfnnnbNf"\r
  55 Content-Disposition: inline\r
  56 In-Reply-To: <m28utp6ugv.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
  57 OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8;\r
  58         url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt\r
  59 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)\r
  60 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net;\r
  61         s=q20121106; t=1391710561;\r
  62         bh=BrSgRFkLas8br8apltM3JJ8JpFSg8qqrWd2ZuhEn/a4=;\r
  63         h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:\r
  64         MIME-Version:Content-Type;\r
  65         b=BpBPn2+lF9evEtOnhkx+UOd/Mz5jArxlZ1876FZY2J7tFfkCZ7/bUxKpxHOlyEXJQ\r
  66         dbOpjqX+gQ4lrBgzbUCkegZ8yNYxY6zeUQ6+8zoCFNunOcvqDzzrBoGI4KelrItgfE\r
  67         ku3ZKVi8KqgE4/feyspD5E7YA2zmp69TyaFtCOqjIErGDXFof2yeG8QvjU+67uqWb6\r
  68         aQ+bYlM12LZc3NTjTMNW1lX+hC4W2945QF8UXkUAb1cKbArZ/k/u+GHASFAc4zy4aw\r
  69         EEouVcN+Y+ByAJOrdH5m2BA2pVDA18KkoNok+V15/uNyD/CJ+ajIok8bGOj0WGBNue\r
  70         kkfK1roF5v7VQ==\r
  71 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  72 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  73 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  74 Precedence: list\r
  75 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  76         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  77 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  78         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  79 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  80 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  81 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  82 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  83         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  84 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:16:10 -0000\r
  85 \r
  86 \r
  87 --0KpsattHCfnnnbNf\r
  88 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
  89 Content-Disposition: inline\r
  90 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  91 \r
  92 On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 12:54:56AM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:\r
  93 > On Wed, Feb 05 2014, "W. Trevor King" wrote:\r
  94 > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 05:00:45PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:\r
  95 > >> #DFF for the light-blue works better for me.\r
  96 > >\r
  97 > > I'm fine with that.  As I said in my cover letter, I'm happy to have\r
  98 > > alternative color schemes suggested.  Does anyone else want to chime\r
  99 > > in on better defaults?  This should probably also be configurable via\r
 100 > > status-config.json.  Maybe:\r
 101 > >\r
 102 > >    { "style": {"html": {"thread-colors": ["#DFF", "#FEF"]}}}\r
 103 >=20\r
 104 > Maybe we can persuade David to test-run new notmuch-status in\r
 105 > his production server before it is pushed to notmuch master, and\r
 106 > bikeshed the style in http://nmbug.tethera.net/status/\r
 107 \r
 108 I'll remove this once the series lands, but I've currently got a\r
 109 preview up at http://tremily.us/status.html\r
 110 \r
 111 > probably no-one is interested to configure those later (if we even\r
 112 > get bikeshed comments... ;)\r
 113 \r
 114 I suppose we can revisit this when someone with an existing color\r
 115 scheme decides to use nmbug and nmbug-status as their bugtracker (red\r
 116 a gray for Red Hat?  Blue and yellow for Python? ;).  Until then, I'm\r
 117 fine with hardcoding this.\r
 118 \r
 119 Cheers,\r
 120 Trevor\r
 121 \r
 122 --=20\r
 123 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).\r
 124 For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy\r
 125 \r
 126 --0KpsattHCfnnnbNf\r
 127 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
 128 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature\r
 129 \r
 130 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
 131 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)\r
 132 \r
 133 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS89DmAAoJEKKfehoaNkbtV88P/R6B17+gjD8cBqFgOUx3x954\r
 134 Qm2bVHZkvh2dpjHR3cUcdu2lQZWTDW/XlJZiyzYXiIpG8moyZT+WFNYcs+ISS1VV\r
 135 ofwW4bICnylpZVpODCeU9p+JyeW3icfFYlCJvih5BUc0TlUeNiYu5Y8b6lF4UEy2\r
 136 OSbifOc8hxFmTkdtrXOEzQhkVIuxKh4g+x8vFGa9JN45YeAMhl+PPWSySjnC+cog\r
 137 z8KxEnNhpVwusnEqTs9CWVxwasRvSsiKxLVw8/54WzgiWAVM79MyG9dLcdVi3h5h\r
 138 YoIPLbtZcNm8bn8KBWZSbw1BSzpI4RYMM7mmk4+3cgQcnHxWw7FktILmg3UAPsCx\r
 139 8muOCWyKOis385+wQoDtwrFvd5h+bYKVapD478/DRDMJWDZ/rQISr62PTgLdNb3N\r
 140 /f+3QmAQycoji8NTLI3KTet9C6I9tGv6/pdFG+pmNagJqacrqXpi2h3XVNPOYmeK\r
 141 OOiSvNq9YkH9fN+MS7p/GWPD7SJtetqjiu47XZWLpsirZymiDajlZn33hCbCdjtQ\r
 142 XkDO+qg6tlW/qqqOWmlLxG1DW/T1Zaai2btEkll/OQGX17PvJwpA7X9QtlKtgld6\r
 143 L0pSUB0vRNriwCIqSftI3+IsfsgbXZuLnQ6gHtYMH4zKX1tfjkQ+3XmLhRiLb5dm\r
 144 UfDHUixZwtSXKS+K6Hyy\r
 145 =+VTs\r
 146 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
 147 \r
 148 --0KpsattHCfnnnbNf--\r