67/1eddfcf49e69a2dc3ef05a7bb0b4585c6ad3e9

   1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BEC40BD9B\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:05:32 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -4.19\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
  13         autolearn=unavailable\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id yHdvtVcGFKVd for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:05:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
  18 Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8])\r
  19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4EF140BFDF\r
  20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:05:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
  21 Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-67-243-144-42.nyc.res.rr.com\r
  22         [67.243.144.42])\r
  23         (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0)\r
  24         by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8LL5Fm5003765\r
  25         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);\r
  26         Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:05:18 -0400 (EDT)\r
  27 Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.72)\r
  28         (envelope-from <jrollins@finestructure.net>)\r
  29         id 1OyA1b-0002J0-Kb; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:05:15 -0400\r
  30 From: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
  31 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  32 Subject: Re: notmuch development\r
  33 In-Reply-To: <87k4men8gx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  34 References: <AANLkTi=31v1TKaiBVzMD1G3oP5C_905Z4cJwGy=0uG5F@mail.gmail.com>\r
  35         <87k4men8gx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  36 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-71-g426c96f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1\r
  37         (i486-pc-linux-gnu)\r
  38 Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:05:12 -0400\r
  39 Message-ID: <87lj6ukdtj.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
  40 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  41 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
  42         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
  43 X-No-Spam-Score: Local\r
  44 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.8\r
  45 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  46 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  47 Precedence: list\r
  48 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  49         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  50 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  51         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  52 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  53 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  54 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  55 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  56         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  57 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:05:32 -0000\r
  58 \r
  59 --=-=-=\r
  60 \r
  61 On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:32:30 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
  62 > Also, if anyone has any suggestions for things that we could do to\r
  63 > improve things if I have to "disappear" again in the future, then I\r
  64 > would be happy to do what I can.\r
  65 \r
  66 Hey, Carl.  The most obvious thing I can think of is delegating some\r
  67 lieutenants to handle processing patches.  There definitely are some\r
  68 worthy candidates (who are kind of already doing this already).  Even if\r
  69 they're not actually pushing patches into a canonical repo, they could\r
  70 at least vet in-coming patches and prep things for your review.  If they\r
  71 could present you with branches that are potentially "ready to go" it\r
  72 might make things a lot easier for you, especially when you're in a\r
  73 crunch.\r
  74 \r
  75 jamie.\r
  76 \r
  77 --=-=-=\r
  78 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
  79 \r
  80 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  81 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
  82 \r
  83 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMmR4IAAoJEO00zqvie6q8LH8P/10Fr94pzR9ZVNLJMYSfgrdH\r
  84 47oc4bk/muEQzvG+8CH4AvH40QJk+UMjXWboJG4KA19rd+E1xSq3wMO3hADevHlc\r
  85 +/uFnSE8AiomI1YskysqIozFVVdrquGDBkV0vtEuN4MlpGwvru2TOM3bQSTFraKO\r
  86 NnJKcc/lkLjgGrKKq6Pi2jSC+ZNsAMJZ/EXFhQpKcTEExtuCZepJJ3dtiXqLzEtd\r
  87 EYZTVugBc+hk2577hYh2ykcF4Sq64Lmijsr6QwR+8dxnNngyvEr/88x1wtHqA2fA\r
  88 8zZzH7eEaV6xckt08BmWRlidOZ1GBOdaVEdn5daI/5FSEflR87nX3w98oYJoBQrQ\r
  89 E3jihPJrvopHp3Jx+jXNns4mtyZwOVq3D5560NWwE9KE7SlL51eQ6fWGHNFYiya4\r
  90 QtTQMXXmfOFXQFKbt3+2y9arqeAS7DDcgGdN/u//BeMAjkx1elR3thhx7ZL8yiiL\r
  91 7Ks0iw8q0Nc+rc2Jt36twJ97OOiFZrodpG2pu3HUnvw5VUbxOfvqMzpiHSyj5pLT\r
  92 +F79BxF8OG3QQDb8/SnKYjyPC1ia4xgJ7shjyshpsybw5Lkzk5cNMDRjNWQN1bJE\r
  93 xoTOTs3S7PRn/UfsLPbtmvpe48PR2w4XHGX74rs2XNmftYJHnSbjKM4h/20TZVAw\r
  94 2ACh7dUfuMYZrluUYm7Q\r
  95 =G05N\r
  96 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  97 --=-=-=--\r