1 Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1409431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:52:54 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
\r
13 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id IEx8d2LA5CXR for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:52:53 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])
\r
19 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF6DB431FB6
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:52:52 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])
\r
24 by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
\r
25 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
26 id 1Tj8HR-0005vm-1p; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:52:49 +0000
\r
27 Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)
\r
28 by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)
\r
29 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
30 id 1Tj8HQ-00065e-Ll; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:52:48 +0000
\r
31 From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
32 To: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>
\r
33 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] indicate length of omitted body content
\r
34 In-Reply-To: <20121213232336.GA21848@hili.localdomain>
\r
35 References: <1355057796-19260-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
36 <87vccb2frl.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
37 <20121213232336.GA21848@hili.localdomain>
\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+155~g7edfdc3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1
\r
39 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
40 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:52:50 +0000
\r
41 Message-ID: <876246cdwd.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
44 X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31
\r
45 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)
\r
46 X-QM-Body-MD5: c1544652371c9255fb515cea9f3ecbdb (of first 20000 bytes)
\r
47 X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8
\r
48 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -
\r
49 X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to
\r
51 spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.
\r
52 This message scored -1.8 points.
\r
53 Summary of the scoring:
\r
54 * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
\r
56 * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]
\r
57 * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
\r
58 provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)
\r
59 * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
\r
60 X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean
\r
61 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
62 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
63 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
65 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
66 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
68 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
69 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
70 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
71 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
72 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
73 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
74 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:52:55 -0000
\r
77 On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
78 > On Sun, 09 Dec 2012 19:21:18 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
80 >> Hi (sorry Peter I had assumed git send-email would have cc'd you on my
\r
81 >> rebase earlier today)
\r
83 >> There was some discussion about this patch series on irc and the general
\r
84 >> view was favourable but that, for consistency, all omitted parts should
\r
85 >> received a content-length (including text/html). This is a little messy
\r
86 >> to code into the if else stuff: Jani suggested putting
\r
87 >> content-length/content-encoding into a small function.
\r
89 >> Anyway I had hope it was just a trivial rebase and could go in, but the
\r
90 >> above will take a bit longer to do neatly so I will leave it for now.
\r
92 > Ok. To save any potential duplicated work: I've updated the patch here,
\r
93 > save for test/sexp. Waiting for that to be pushed before updating it.
\r
95 Sorry I am confused: isn't test/sexp already in master?
\r