Re: [PATCH] emacs: wash: make word-wrap bound message width
[notmuch-archives.git] / 64 / 301f15b7b6dcaf1006963b23821c71c9dfb43b
1 Return-Path: <wking@tremily.us>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F02431FBF\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 May 2014 15:29:41 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.1\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id Vwxc+qIwblqp for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Thu,  8 May 2014 15:29:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
18 Received: from qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net\r
19         (qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.96])\r
20         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891D6431FAE\r
21         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  8 May 2014 15:29:35 -0700 (PDT)\r
22 Received: from omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.60])\r
23         by qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast\r
24         id zZyD1n0061HzFnQ59aVaNS; Thu, 08 May 2014 22:29:34 +0000\r
25 Received: from odin.tremily.us ([24.18.63.50])\r
26         by omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast\r
27         id zaVY1n00Z152l3L3aaVZ4F; Thu, 08 May 2014 22:29:34 +0000\r
28 Received: by odin.tremily.us (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
29         id 9173B11944F4; Thu,  8 May 2014 15:29:31 -0700 (PDT)\r
30 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tremily.us; s=odin;\r
31         t=1399588171; bh=8jc+j4oitm2aEsvo9yHxjbYAWdq1TJdaoQAtHYjvDgg=;\r
32         h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;\r
33         b=lCBjwS3fKkPMw2cuTJdLZLxcA9Ccjjnd59kSg8l53VuQENqRnfGotK+dctI+eq5ix\r
34         clr8mw5hKb9ARJEs/R5foNvwHv/rwkw21loivwnU0RLojhqlkqmLZNuJw2x5GR8c7C\r
35         +bjU0mbv8UGYcBqzZnSOkfaM386h6oXSKQ1TfL+w=\r
36 Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 15:29:31 -0700\r
37 From: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>\r
38 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
39 Subject: Submodules for language bindings (was: Github?)\r
40 Message-ID: <20140508222931.GU28634@odin.tremily.us>\r
41 References:\r
42  <CA+kKtKAw=nEn2dfcvF6++gD5ng+S3T8SLAdVL=Hs=EsvwUg6aw@mail.gmail.com>\r
43         <87iopgkaiz.fsf@nikula.org> <E1WiJsj-0004mz-VK@teckel.deptj.eu>\r
44         <20140508101325.GC23124@vilya.m0g.net>\r
45         <CA+kKtKA8Q5z6Pys9RAumLTiJvmGwWYKGXDkKr9Mh_6ecV-7sdA@mail.gmail.com>\r
46         <CA+kKtKCP8Oo2sHz5Cd0+=BmS9UK=b2h9GrGopUFwWZ=GJUXqyA@mail.gmail.com>\r
47         <20140508203019.GA2374@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
48         <20140508212100.GD23124@vilya.m0g.net>\r
49         <20140508220046.GB2374@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
50 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
51 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;\r
52         protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PjTdUoKi0+yCYsVx"\r
53 Content-Disposition: inline\r
54 In-Reply-To: <20140508220046.GB2374@chitra.no-ip.org>\r
55 OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8;\r
56         url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt\r
57 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)\r
58 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net;\r
59         s=q20140121; t=1399588174;\r
60         bh=wVVBc6IZZRIXOP0rAikdzJPRCm1bGv0rT2/EU3Rwi50=;\r
61         h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:\r
62         MIME-Version:Content-Type;\r
63         b=uGM9sY4Vwdjudrd6AE8Nnnbq0fYJu+vFfCQAbgCt5kpfvIRNJkh8tdyf3pqdVjkcj\r
64         B6sKDtMfijYxtrwTmTE555Asbni6JZjtAHIrMYW8SXgokHi5rCpaYCyIDnD/ctcPr1\r
65         cBVYL+topBqrrtKKNdjU2R5/KkHDUGR/Pl2tavZ5Zwhbr8s3SNi7X8VyZ/zSJqwbrC\r
66         hnywsgbjnraZFBe0J3lMHW5zu3735bSAoFgaxFdpLEudsa51YiEln6rOIE7vebNfD9\r
67         8wAwOmsNmoE9rOphGQNVw0m73DJ9APnSQ71RXlm+7MUAfOKj6M+IIH6VY5G4tNU7xX\r
68         4V9VB8b+Lry1g==\r
69 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
70 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
71 Precedence: list\r
72 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
73         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
74 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
75         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
76 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
77 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
78 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
79 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
80         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
81 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 22:29:41 -0000\r
82 \r
83 \r
84 --PjTdUoKi0+yCYsVx\r
85 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
86 Content-Disposition: inline\r
87 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
88 \r
89 On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:00:46AM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:\r
90 > One of my TODOs is to also package the ruby bindings, and\r
91 > notmuch-vim.  The only thing preventing me now is my unfamiliarty\r
92 > with ruby, and Fedora packaging guidelines for ruby-gems.\r
93 \r
94 I think this is one argument argument in favor of submodules, because\r
95 they make it easy to treat the bindings as separate packages.  Once\r
96 you have separate packages, it's easy to delegate packaging (e.g. =E2=80=9CI\r
97 don't use the Ruby bindings, so I'm not going to maintain the\r
98 Ruby-binding package.  I'll leave that to Alice, who likes Ruby, but\r
99 is less familiar with $distro's Python packaging=E2=80=9D).\r
100 \r
101 Of course, you can have separate binding packages (if you like)\r
102 without having separate per-binding repositories (or branches).  I\r
103 personally like the looser coupling of submodules (and the ability to\r
104 easily delegate maintainer-ship), but I don't see any notmuch-binding\r
105 work in my future, so I don't mind either way.  Consider this an =E2=80=9CI\r
106 like submodules for this sort of thing=E2=80=9D post more than a =E2=80=9Cn=\r
107 otmuch\r
108 should use submodules=E2=80=9D post ;).\r
109 \r
110 Cheers,\r
111 Trevor\r
112 \r
113 --=20\r
114 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).\r
115 For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy\r
116 \r
117 --PjTdUoKi0+yCYsVx\r
118 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
119 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature\r
120 \r
121 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
122 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)\r
123 \r
124 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTbAVIAAoJEKKfehoaNkbtLdgP/2r9u2Cd+ri8nqjpCvfPEQlA\r
125 o8t2rY8CZErhAeK36ZYmolC5GLjKVv7/+i5edxRMMTV4CIa7Fdss4xl3VyAWDsK0\r
126 y7/4qPeGMGyrcQsCk77ArVv5nh+rtg+SBy9L7lc2fKff1Nr6MHcU3B5tgkWkPLnq\r
127 uAMjdJ7hOFttDqKpYXXzbd3v6+Kbld8dT8krNehtQ61ZPQ+CAYUvosX2wNFurCWH\r
128 oBOPg7QEucHDaZVgvmljcoEsifuEQm1OgYI6v9bz2gMtMMTgiaDq9VKM64Z7JpLC\r
129 cnBgb1n8dGLKI7S0wNLhlM18Mw22xtyFxaHU3HKI84nyG/hrgQHGm2QkeQ/zs4qs\r
130 mfs+MpzAqteqk8akFRs7ODy6PP+2dnLZA4RbSdS4z8j38dyF+Wzn+BkUf20yk5Cj\r
131 tVdzVIbfuw8RiYoVUAJ501HgKCNxuKhppCU+/PzByB3silLIUhFf4tzPWd595qqR\r
132 Jf1NISv2bJjKnhHXXjtGrVtxwg0TpnVh4ko/Rw855qCUyxPWnhBEKXHrsYm3ZBS6\r
133 GHNaWXSe2fCEvhHZuiB6YK6pJPapS8sS3AdGQNoJj9eCQYRnk+KSf/dwdaLWqDky\r
134 NNfc80nmEw2vbM6KWXiOqtRHO0pfvbZxH3rQ5SmZ04dFavRp87G5YcyJGf2EIa5e\r
135 F67wCMYN11PWNZP2LEJH\r
136 =r7l7\r
137 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
138 \r
139 --PjTdUoKi0+yCYsVx--\r