63/e049d3a2206f7cbe890f0ab02f26801f6bc83d

   1 Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FEB431FBD\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  8 Aug 2012 05:31:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
  12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
  13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
  14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  16         with ESMTP id aeWOa0f-6nWj for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  17         Wed,  8 Aug 2012 05:31:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
  18 Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com\r
  19         [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
  20         (No client certificate requested)\r
  21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40B64431FAE\r
  22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  8 Aug 2012 05:31:11 -0700 (PDT)\r
  23 Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so1726183pbb.26\r
  24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 05:31:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
  25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
  26         h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
  27         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition\r
  28         :content-transfer-encoding;\r
  29         bh=xCv0z7h5gQXJ+GkzpznTEiAn/9caTFgvBm0M2UJR0Cc=;\r
  30         b=EJzZMidTEe3PPu4fj3nLd/V9T9OHOXS9l5rrVMy5DYzJkOiskZSiu+gp9kc6KMpOzn\r
  31         XCqb9j+osIPzQXQa6Gk3yz2vr1h5gcWD7fH8moXSvF5DxPHHeB7UVgAil+huuIOhIJHZ\r
  32         CZaqJOjbnEkWAZUGkGEkHSGtZBZGgtJnhaf/S0QAOdTgSCVY1m1nsFJosN9/CiupXpkG\r
  33         22o3R8UjO7QL9Wgo1YnlDiJ8QxaJR7T+/qLMafVsuTyi7VCA89Ib2kK2YbN04XbBU+RL\r
  34         gXg+GbPE4YZsGkLDDPuy4Xha0F8N37KMucD0Hy8XLu+Bg36+q3rMRPaPaC7okq9XLx/R\r
  35         kjDQ==\r
  36 Received: by 10.68.229.2 with SMTP id sm2mr35816799pbc.57.1344429070428;\r
  37         Wed, 08 Aug 2012 05:31:10 -0700 (PDT)\r
  38 Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
  39         [220.233.42.215])\r
  40         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nr8sm9897154pbc.43.2012.08.08.05.31.07\r
  41         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
  42         Wed, 08 Aug 2012 05:31:09 -0700 (PDT)\r
  43 Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 22:31:02 +1000\r
  44 Message-ID: <20120808223102.GB2353@hili.localdomain>\r
  45 From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
  46 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
  47 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] show: indicate length of omitted body content (json)\r
  48 In-Reply-To: <87fw7ymhn1.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
  49 References: <1344151345-25411-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
  50         <87fw7ymhn1.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
  51 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
  53 Content-Disposition: inline\r
  54 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
  55 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  58 Precedence: list\r
  59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  60         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  67         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  68 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:31:11 -0000\r
  69 \r
  70 On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 00:01:06 +0100, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
  71 > \r
  72 > I have two minor queries: do you think omitted text/html parts should\r
  73 > also have the length given? Or even should it always be sent? But I am\r
  74 > happy with it as is.\r
  75 \r
  76 It could be added.  I wouldn't have much use for it myself.\r
  77 text/html parts should usually be small enough that it doesn't matter,\r
  78 and I never retrieve them when there is a text/plain alternative.\r
  79 \r
  80 Peter\r