1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD66431FDA
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 17:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id zKBrW+pJEgBY for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sat, 7 Apr 2012 17:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7A1431FD2
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 17:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
\r
21 Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
22 by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E3966E00DB
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 17:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new
\r
25 Received: from finestructure.net (unknown [76.89.193.65])
\r
26 (Authenticated sender: jrollins)
\r
27 by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A86766E00E1
\r
28 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 17:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
\r
29 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
30 id EC9424EF; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 17:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
\r
31 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
32 To: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
33 Subject: emacs tagging cleanup
\r
34 Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 17:35:30 -0700
\r
35 Message-Id: <1333845338-22960-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
36 X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.1
\r
37 In-Reply-To: <1333354853-25729-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
38 References: <1333354853-25729-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
39 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
42 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
43 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
44 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
45 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
46 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
47 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
48 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
49 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
51 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 00:35:52 -0000
\r
53 This is a rework of the series [0]. It addresses some of the comments
\r
54 from Dmitry, and extends the scope to clean up the tagging interface
\r
55 in both search and show mode.
\r
57 [0] id:"1333354853-25729-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"
\r
59 The goal here is to present a cleaner tagging interface to the user.
\r
60 We want things to be simple, not confusing or redundant. To that end
\r
61 I have extended the notmuch-tag function to handle prompting if
\r
62 needed. The main user-facing functions are now:
\r
64 notmuch-search-tag tag thread or region
\r
65 notmuch-search-tag-all tag all thread in search buffer
\r
66 notmuch-show-tag tag message
\r
67 notmuch-show-tag-all tag all message in show buffer
\r
69 I think this provides a much cleaner interface that is more useful to
\r
70 users. In particular, this improves the ability to tag regions in
\r
73 I have eliminated two user-facing functions (notmuch-search-tag-thread
\r
74 and notmuch-show-tag-message) since they are now redundant. This
\r
75 might cause a slight hiccup for those using those functions, but I
\r
76 think it's better in the long run.
\r
78 Unfortunately something in the last patch (last two patches, I guess)
\r
79 is now causing a two of our more esoteric tests to fail. After
\r
80 spending half the day trying to figure out why I'm at a loss. And I
\r
81 don't want all this work to be wasted so I'm submitting it anyway.
\r
82 Hopefully someone (maybe the creator of those tests?) can figure out
\r