1 Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA454431FD0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id g9qm0hcjQsft for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 16 May 2011 17:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.43.72.2])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DFF431FB6
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
21 by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2005429A056;
\r
22 Mon, 16 May 2011 17:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
24 id 6AE4E254183; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
26 To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>,
\r
27 Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
28 Florian Friesdorf <flo@chaoflow.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
29 Subject: Re: address completion when composing
\r
30 In-Reply-To: <87tycuza1x.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
31 References: <87fwolh1mu.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net>
\r
32 <87d3jph107.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net>
\r
33 <87oc39i2a4.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
\r
34 <877h9whjhi.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net>
\r
35 <87mxisgyhf.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <87tycuza1x.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
36 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
38 Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:30:45 -0700
\r
39 Message-ID: <87zkmm9nii.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
41 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
42 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
43 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
44 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
46 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
47 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
48 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
49 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
50 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
51 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
53 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
54 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
55 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:30:55 -0000
\r
59 On Mon, 16 May 2011 22:04:42 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote:
\r
60 > No, just the terms are, not the full string. (although for search, that
\r
61 > could actually be enough)
\r
63 Right. It's easy enough to search on the "To:" field. But for address
\r
64 completion, I think we realyl will want to fix the database to store
\r
65 complete names+addresses that can be recovered for messages matching a
\r
71 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
73 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
74 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
76 iEYEARECAAYFAk3RwbUACgkQ6JDdNq8qSWiiGwCfYN9L8cBMbExf5PoRLNKt4C+2
\r
77 bH4AnRdwaDub7nbbF/s0Wh1pWS9ZIGdm
\r
79 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r