1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B049431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 02:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id S8rCV0ATB9nn for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 8 Sep 2014 02:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com (mail-we0-f174.google.com
\r
18 [74.125.82.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6C44431FB6
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 02:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id t60so775391wes.5
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 02:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
\r
24 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
25 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
\r
26 h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
\r
27 :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=uPYBXi2pGwqnKFJ+3m9H+Hm0BoASDIGoZpXTAJkKbYI=;
\r
29 b=IwydY1AArVfvNSMU6JEKhKmW0f941lhaeH9l4Lm8Cn7XKZStkiy9kQShQopRxtZ3uT
\r
30 P6zXR10RHWQfhZFA7tC1dU5PpXXslqEtRmv/jWhEtJBR9ln4Z5M1x7wuDBiYqm86SNx9
\r
31 9ogDKAZuqzn+LK4M+A5nOn/OUO1TPcfoX452rZ9aTEvvvckx+O60eXmaYpRrjVusoqrh
\r
32 n/3BPvsTuYELIlY+ndK7dBhdh4MOCm+Gl8/w5pBNYP8GgBrvxaX1ttz6/+tyDkBfG+wf
\r
33 4w25j4+RRDbJBEI8tVCQA9Pc6rvOS/SzV01bSmL10pn0Uz0JXBFAJu+dQrZ8ojGtgpew
\r
36 ALoCoQkqhf8zCzl/BGOwQmv3cwz7LgbKvk+l8AXqX/cNDY7SavS37+SAmOjplRqgR0oCYjhD0+i0
\r
37 X-Received: by 10.194.3.106 with SMTP id b10mr32575029wjb.3.1410167993428;
\r
38 Mon, 08 Sep 2014 02:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
\r
39 Received: from localhost ([2a01:348:1a2:1:c97f:acf4:c706:7534])
\r
40 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
\r
41 pc6sm10396649wjb.43.2014.09.08.02.19.52 for <multiple recipients>
\r
42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
\r
43 Mon, 08 Sep 2014 02:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
\r
44 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 Subject: Re: [Patch v2 0/2] emacs: show: mark messages read if seen in buffer
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <1410020531-24419-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
47 References: <1410020531-24419-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
48 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
49 (x86_64-apple-darwin)
\r
50 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
51 Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:19:50 +0100
\r
52 Message-ID: <m2fvg2zcy1.fsf@fenchurch.hh.sledj.net>
\r
54 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
55 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
56 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
59 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 09:20:00 -0000
\r
69 I like the general approach.
\r
71 On Sat, Sep 06 2014, Mark Walters wrote:
\r
72 > There are two changes from v1. First patch 1 is new. Secondly I have
\r
73 > modified the defcustom for the second patch. It is slightly fiddly as
\r
74 > my function has a parameter the default function does not. The
\r
75 > defcustom in the previous patch worked but it was unable to parse
\r
76 > itself so when you revisited the defcustom it looked like you had
\r
77 > specified the lisp manually rather than having selected one of the two
\r
80 Is this because you want to include the parameter at the same point in
\r
81 the custom definition? It's not uncommon to have a separate variable for
\r
82 (things like) the proportion. It would make the declaration much simpler.
\r
84 > I like this version of the mark read function; but it is quite a lot
\r
85 > of code (all unused unless the user selects this option so it is low
\r
86 > risk). If people would prefer not to include it then I can just post
\r
87 > the relevant code to the wiki and people can add it to their .emacs
\r
88 > file if they want this function.
\r
90 If it's not the default, then I would be in favour of including it.
\r