1 Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96938431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:23:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=1.151, BAYES_00=-2.599] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 8fbII85Fhgot; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:23:48 -0800 (PST)
\r
16 Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
17 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E538431FAE;
\r
18 Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:23:48 -0800 (PST)
\r
19 Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
20 id D4B8425427B; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:23:46 -0800 (PST)
\r
21 From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
22 To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
\r
23 In-Reply-To: <7vljekipnd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
\r
24 References: <87ljf8pvxx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
25 <87hbpwpoko.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
26 <5641883d1002060727ia4e6c16lf800a92fc8735430@mail.gmail.com>
\r
27 <201002081614.24284.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
28 <871vgr78lr.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
29 <87iqa2y0gz.fsf@steelpick.localdomain>
\r
30 <87r5oqe7mi.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
31 <871vgmki4f.fsf@steelpick.localdomain>
\r
32 <7vaav8hpfo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
\r
33 <87tytdiqob.fsf@steelpick.localdomain>
\r
34 <alpine.DEB.1.00.1002191138280.20986@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
\r
35 <873a0xhwxs.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
36 <alpine.DEB.1.00.1002192204050.20986@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
\r
37 <87eikfhec1.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
38 <7vaav3bnr5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
\r
39 <87y6ilf4w7.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
40 <7vljekipnd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
\r
41 Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:23:46 -0800
\r
42 Message-ID: <87sk8rvmj1.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
44 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
45 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
46 Cc: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>,
\r
47 Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
\r
48 Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>, git@vger.kernel.org,
\r
49 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org,
\r
50 Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
\r
51 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail,
\r
52 with change from GPLv2 to GPLv2+.
\r
53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
57 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
65 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:23:49 -0000
\r
69 On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:42:30 -0800, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
\r
70 > Please drop the above the next time.
\r
72 Oops. Yes, I missed that.
\r
74 > FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was not
\r
75 > meant to be an exhaustive list. "blame -C -C -C" may tell you more.
\r
79 > You are the party that wants this relicensing, not me. Please do not
\r
80 > burden me with excessive legwork for you, but help me a bit more
\r
81 > proactively to make this happen.
\r
83 I hope you see I haven't asked you to do any additional legwork. A
\r
84 suggestion was made to construct a patch, which I did. You always have
\r
85 the option of accepting or rejecting the patch as you see fit.
\r
87 > Oh, I never said "do not use message ID". I said "message ID alone is not
\r
88 > good enough for most people". Users of gmane and notmuch who know the
\r
89 > tool they use would benefit from having message ID, _too_, but even if you
\r
90 > were a user of notmuch, unless you have subscribed to the list and have
\r
91 > your own archive, you wouldn't be able to say "show id:frotz".
\r
93 Certainly. My assumption was that in a commit message for git, readers
\r
94 would naturally assume that a message ID with no additional
\r
95 specification could be found in the archives of the standard git mailing
\r
96 list, (which is the case here). Otherwise, I would have qualified the
\r
97 message ID more specifically.
\r
102 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
104 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
105 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
\r
107 iD8DBQFLhB0y6JDdNq8qSWgRAiwEAKCki1ecxM9ER1gc2oYhYj527s7LTQCfbUhW
\r
108 KmeGdMU+jf/znCoVZpcQhik=
\r
110 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r