1 Return-Path: <eric@deptj.eu>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9E4431FBD
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id KJEAJKWDaqSp for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from earth.solardns.com (earth.solardns.com [94.76.229.85])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93BDB431FB6
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from cpc1-finc12-2-0-cust846.4-2.cable.virginm.net
\r
23 ([82.18.251.79]:33040 helo=teckel.deptj.eu)
\r
24 by earth.solardns.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
\r
25 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eric@deptj.eu>)
\r
26 id 1WbZQo-0000Bo-VO; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 18:52:03 +0100
\r
27 Received: from eric by teckel.deptj.eu with local (Exim 4.80.1)
\r
28 (envelope-from <eric@deptj.eu>)
\r
29 id 1WbZQo-00028u-60; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 18:52:02 +0100
\r
30 From: Eric <eric@deptj.eu>
\r
31 Subject: Re: excessive thread fusing
\r
32 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
33 In-Reply-To: <87ioq5mrbz.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
34 References: <87ioq5mrbz.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
35 Message-Id: <E1WbZQo-00028u-60@teckel.deptj.eu>
\r
36 Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 18:52:02 +0100
\r
37 X--MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
\r
38 X--MailScanner-ID: 1WbZQo-0000Bo-VO
\r
39 X--MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service
\r
40 Provider for details
\r
41 X--MailScanner-SpamCheck:
\r
42 X--MailScanner-From: eric@deptj.eu
\r
43 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
\r
44 please include it with any abuse report
\r
45 X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - earth.solardns.com
\r
46 X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - notmuchmail.org
\r
47 X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
\r
48 X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - deptj.eu
\r
49 X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: earth.solardns.com: authenticated_id: deptjeu/from_h
\r
53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
57 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
65 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 17:52:14 -0000
\r
67 On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 21:33:36 +0900, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
69 > Gregor Zattler mentioned some problems with threading at
\r
71 > id:20120126004024.GA13704@shi.workgroup
\r
73 > After some off list discussions, I believe I have a smaller test case.
\r
75 > The attached maildir contains 24 messages from the org mode list.
\r
77 > According to notmuch, these form one thread, but I can't figure out
\r
78 > exactly why. It seems like the chronologically first two messages should
\r
79 > be a seperate thread. There are several of the infamous malformed ME-E
\r
80 > In-reply-to headers, but each of these messages also has a References
\r
81 > header; this seems to indicate a case missed by commit cf8aaafbad68.
\r
84 This may not actually be any help, but both hypermail and mhonarc agree
\r
85 that two messages form a separate thread from the rest. I believe that
\r
86 the latter, at least, is the JWZ algorithm.
\r