1 Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFD440DDE7
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:20:52 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id ubqu1BCHQSQJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:20:42 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from rodolpho.mayfirst.org (mail.freitas.net [209.234.253.107])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F99540DDC1
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:20:42 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by rodolpho.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51783CD51
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:20:39 -0500 (EST)
\r
25 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at rodolpho.mayfirst.org
\r
26 Received: from rodolpho.mayfirst.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
27 by localhost (rodolpho.mayfirst.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
\r
28 port 10024) with ESMTP id 5yW7TdF1Eh1a for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
29 Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:20:39 -0500 (EST)
\r
30 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender:
\r
31 smtpauth@rodolpho.mayfirst.org) with ESMTPSA id 5DCE93CD4B
\r
32 Message-ID: <4CDDF5F3.9040800@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
33 Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:20:35 -0500
\r
34 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
35 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
\r
36 rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100918 Icedove/3.1.4
\r
38 To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
39 Subject: splittng threads [was: Re: Combining threads]
\r
40 References: <AANLkTimDjk_-Xjpf6uovGXgyG_3j-ySLWQR+0UvdVjjT@mail.gmail.com>
\r
41 <87mxpe81t9.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
42 In-Reply-To: <87mxpe81t9.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
43 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
\r
44 OpenPGP: id=D21739E9
\r
45 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
\r
46 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
\r
47 boundary="------------enigC52BB2FCC997C6F3F93D148E"
\r
48 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
49 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
51 Reply-To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
53 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
56 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
57 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
59 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
61 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 02:20:52 -0000
\r
63 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
\r
64 --------------enigC52BB2FCC997C6F3F93D148E
\r
65 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
\r
66 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
68 (hi list -- i'm new here; don't be afraid to explain things to me that
\r
69 seem obvious to you, or correct my vocabulary if i'm using it wrong)
\r
71 On 11/12/2010 08:11 PM, Carl Worth wrote:
\r
72 > But I suppose it's as simple a matter of creating a new "top-level
\r
73 > message" term in the database. The split operation would set this
\r
74 > term. The explicit join operation would clear it, and the implicit join=
\r
76 > operation would have to be made to respect it by avoiding merging any
\r
77 > top-level messages as a child of some other message. I haven't thought
\r
78 > through exactly how that would work in the implementation, but hopefull=
\r
80 > it wouldn't be too hard.
\r
82 my current understanding is that a not-uncommon use case is to have two
\r
83 separate notmuch instances, synchronized by syncing maildirs and
\r
84 tagsets. Would such a thread-split be syncable between two notmuch
\r
90 --------------enigC52BB2FCC997C6F3F93D148E
\r
91 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
\r
92 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
\r
93 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
\r
95 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
96 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
\r
97 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
\r
99 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJM3fXzAAoJEMzS7ZTSFznp4asP+wbTrdsom7/G+lpv8uSsgf0+
\r
100 4qQlI2g/dx3EUHYvZbXHjlhTO43y5sNOkR2sxda4z3Oo5CtnfZyfPXdXa011hBpJ
\r
101 /39i5uCxtoMG1q4bV8Hl0sNwWWrzvUcQ1ZZRevTWavsmChD2FjgALVjXmmY+Tkfr
\r
102 TiUleM9BcRN5ckQPCxvS3ecx30QT8BlF7IzDFDd3uYfmQGnDWteeircM6GktDFB2
\r
103 2P59oyENSbgVIVSVLXFm0oxvhc9hdjFBEFW65s4JI/cdk4OLlXoZZVC6nz3VCdyW
\r
104 JZ4zP1+qyTfaJot5fPGTBWzVOJXuwdAJpcRaLUc2cMfhs3/n4PLB87Io1qNuBw8k
\r
105 rodiFHRN94Ngfp0STsFw4k4N3Sm4jxoZFyMjuBQVAUu1I/dy+IB5BvM3kpSiFW+M
\r
106 jDJE45QaPuO2eHB9C0Z9xXvHHuzKK0EJXTnShFJqqN8R060ME/W6TO2/emRNWRG7
\r
107 q7OQBnJ/r+rrmajRcjnl+cbRO7TJzhpwTBHRN9PeDUDF4rse628WI1MTdiQ1irMJ
\r
108 jbbrnAo8yPX6YcMWdi63m+0HJtm6f9Z5pfwVqzjlXs+W7h7lq/EsEOSaILQnTJdF
\r
109 DzfS1uHwvResMYuDvPyGnrZPV1jP2bQ27/7WMJsnyZ9fQuEEF6OJGcMgpP41GbZt
\r
110 NvZRrUWT+JZOsRe3PCQn
\r
112 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
114 --------------enigC52BB2FCC997C6F3F93D148E--
\r