1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0242D431FBF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 00:40:03 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id ccpsoQ3-Shh2 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Wed, 5 Mar 2014 00:39:53 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C83A431FBD
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 00:39:53 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1])
\r
21 by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id C115E100245;
\r
22 Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:39:46 +0200 (EET)
\r
23 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
24 To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,
\r
25 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
26 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] literal folder: prefix, new path: prefix
\r
27 In-Reply-To: <8738ix4qeg.fsf@tethera.net>
\r
28 References: <cover.1393105055.git.jani@nikula.org>
\r
29 <87mwh8mn58.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87siqxiwlc.fsf@nikula.org>
\r
30 <8738ix4qeg.fsf@tethera.net>
\r
31 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+112~g4e0c1d5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
32 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
33 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
\r
34 $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
\r
35 !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
\r
36 Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:39:46 +0200
\r
37 Message-ID: <m2d2i13up9.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
39 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
40 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
41 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
43 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
44 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
45 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
46 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
47 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
48 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
50 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
51 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
52 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 08:40:03 -0000
\r
54 On Tue, Mar 04 2014, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
56 > Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> writes:
\r
59 >> I think we should use the prereq mechanism in the tests to check if a
\r
60 >> required test database is in place, skipping the test if not. This
\r
61 >> should be fairly straightforward to do, and does not care *how* the test
\r
62 >> database is to be fetched. (I'm undecided whether the test should verify
\r
63 >> the checksum, or the part that fetches the database. Minor detail.)
\r
65 > Yep, prereqs sounds fine. SHA256 verification is pretty fast (on the
\r
66 > scale of test suite operations), so I'd lean to doing it late, but
\r
67 > I could be convinced otherwise.
\r
69 I decline commenting on prereqs... ;/
\r
72 >> I know git annex in principle, but don't have any practical experience
\r
73 >> with it. I don't really have any ideas for that.
\r
75 > Well, if you don't mind the rest of the setup (SHA256 sums checked,
\r
76 > tarballs fetched if needed), we can forge ahead for now.
\r
78 I can contribute script with interface
\r
80 ./fetch-and-check.sh [--verify-only] destdir url sha256sum
\r