1 Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11099431E84
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:43:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id ShnBAcyeAioa for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:43:46 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com (mail-ww0-f41.google.com
\r
18 [74.125.82.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
19 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
20 4A4A4431FB6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:43:46 -0800
\r
22 Received: by wgbdt11 with SMTP id dt11so918486wgb.2
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:43:43 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: by 10.180.109.198 with SMTP id hu6mr7582226wib.16.1327452223594;
\r
25 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:43:43 -0800 (PST)
\r
26 Received: from localhost ([109.131.95.182])
\r
27 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ex2sm57942961wib.1.2012.01.24.16.43.41
\r
28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
29 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:43:42 -0800 (PST)
\r
30 From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
\r
31 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>,
\r
32 Mark Anderson <MarkR.Anderson@amd.com>,
\r
33 Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>,
\r
34 Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
35 Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
\r
36 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] emacs: `notmuch-show-buttonize-links' only
\r
37 `notmuch-show's a message if it exists
\r
38 In-Reply-To: <87pqecdmd1.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
39 References: <871uqsku4h.fsf@praet.org>
\r
40 <1327222469-29487-2-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>
\r
41 <87pqecdmd1.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
42 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+113~g5a6e67e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
43 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
44 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:41:47 +0100
\r
45 Message-ID: <87k44gsjec.fsf@praet.org>
\r
48 ALoCoQnMDya9YCy+wvsa/lWIaqb+JkPP6VjcTQsxAA5jjXPosohN22ZRGR8Pn6tA/HnIt9QyM26t
\r
49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
50 Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
55 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:43:47 -0000
\r
65 On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:10:02 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
67 > > * emacs/notmuch-show.el (notmuch-show-if-found): new function that only shows
\r
68 > > a message/thread if present in the database and otherwise returns an error.
\r
70 > I like this in principle but it interacts awkwardly with the automatic tag
\r
71 > exclusion. If the id:<message-id> matches a message with an excluded tag
\r
72 > then notmuch-show-if-found will not let you view it, but if you typed the
\r
73 > same search in a search field it would show you the message.
\r
75 > Note notmuch show currently does not currently respect excluded tags (see
\r
76 > id:"871uqvgrnm.fsf@qmul.ac.uk"), and this is not completely trivial to
\r
77 > fix since it is not clear quite what its behaviour should be in some
\r
80 > Perhaps we could have an option like "--include-all" to notmuch
\r
81 > search/count to tell it not to apply the exclusions. On the other hand
\r
82 > that might also be useful as something the user can type in a search box
\r
83 > so a special search term (eg include:all) might be better.
\r
88 Sorry I haven't taken the time to have a look at your patch series yet.
\r
89 (I probably wouldn't have anything useful to contribute anyway...)
\r
91 I'll be taking a stab at fixing this when the exclusion-dust settles.
\r
93 Thanks for pointing it out!
\r