1 Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21279431FBC
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:45:32 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3]
\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id d8fBa0nVKZdi for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:45:31 -0800 (PST)
\r
19 Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])
\r
20 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
21 (No client certificate requested)
\r
22 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A54431FAE
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:45:31 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])
\r
25 by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
\r
26 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
27 id 1TfelL-0000kO-Tc; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:45:20 +0000
\r
28 Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost)
\r
29 by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)
\r
30 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
31 id 1TfelL-0004ky-Ki; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:45:19 +0000
\r
32 From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
33 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
34 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Allow emacs to toggle display of all parts
\r
36 In-Reply-To: <1354496317-24564-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
37 References: <1354496317-24564-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
38 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+81~g9730584 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1
\r
39 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
40 Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:45:22 +0000
\r
41 Message-ID: <87zk1uvjp9.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
44 X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31
\r
45 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)
\r
46 X-QM-Body-MD5: 47c21428a9b3ed77dfb2c7d06e543307 (of first 20000 bytes)
\r
47 X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.1
\r
48 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -
\r
49 X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to
\r
51 spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.
\r
52 This message scored -1.1 points.
\r
53 Summary of the scoring:
\r
54 * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
\r
56 * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]
\r
57 * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
\r
58 provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)
\r
59 * 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails
\r
60 * 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
\r
61 X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean
\r
62 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
63 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
65 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
66 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
68 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
69 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
70 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
71 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
72 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
73 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
74 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:45:32 -0000
\r
79 I now have a version which does this `right': using invisibility as with
\r
80 citations and signatures etc. It is working but I need to look through
\r
81 more carefully before posting.
\r
87 On Mon, 03 Dec 2012, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
88 > This is rather more polished version of
\r
89 > id:1351152563-27277-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com.
\r
91 > The first patch modifies the behaviour of show refresh buffer to keep
\r
92 > state more accurately where possible. It can never be perfect but it
\r
93 > makes a reasonable attempt. This is independent of patches 2 and 3.
\r
95 > The second patch allows the user to toggle the visibility of any part
\r
96 > with 't' on the part button. It does this by storing a list of all
\r
97 > parts that the user has over-ruled.
\r
99 > The final patch binds the toggle to the default action in cases where
\r
100 > the part has no filename. Is this a reasonable heuristic? And should
\r
101 > it be customisable? In all cases the defined actions (save, view,
\r
102 > other, and toggle) always do their action (ie they do not apply any
\r
105 > Overall I am pleased with the way it works. The one caveat is that it
\r
106 > does redisplay the whole buffer when toggling the parts: it might be
\r
107 > nice to use invisibility but that is beyond my lisp. Moreover it could
\r
108 > be added at a later stage without changing the user experience.
\r
116 > Mark Walters (3):
\r
117 > emacs: show: make refresh fix point(ish)
\r
118 > emacs: allow the user to toggle the visibility of
\r
119 > multipart/alternative parts
\r
120 > emacs: show make default part button toggle view when sensible
\r
122 > emacs/notmuch-show.el | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
\r
123 > 1 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
\r
projects / notmuch-archives.git / blob