1 Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D89F431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
\r
13 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id H3G1b1O2OkJz for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])
\r
19 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2E1C431FAE
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])
\r
24 by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
\r
25 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
26 id 1SBYpw-000077-8O; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:49:24 +0000
\r
27 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]
\r
29 by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)
\r
30 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
31 id 1SBYpv-0006qZ-Pd; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:49:23 +0000
\r
32 From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
33 To: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
34 Subject: Reply code with TEXT/PLAIN
\r
35 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+65~g8bf1842 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
36 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
37 Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:49:36 +0000
\r
38 Message-ID: <87d3814qkv.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
41 X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223
\r
42 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)
\r
43 X-QM-Body-MD5: 81184fa3cf15241b16be16260c7c8c4d (of first 20000 bytes)
\r
44 X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8
\r
45 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -
\r
46 X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to
\r
48 spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.
\r
49 This message scored -1.8 points.
\r
50 Summary of the scoring:
\r
51 * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
\r
53 * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]
\r
54 * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
\r
55 provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)
\r
56 * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
\r
58 * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
\r
59 X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean
\r
60 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
61 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
63 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
64 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
65 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
67 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
68 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
69 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
70 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
71 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
72 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 21:49:26 -0000
\r
76 I am not certain if this is a bug or a request to work around broken
\r
77 mailers. I tried replying to a message today (with recent git) and got
\r
78 an empty message. I looked at the json output for reply and it contains
\r
79 the message but the content type is TEXT/PLAIN rather than
\r
82 This seems to mean it doesn't match in notmuch-match-content-type
\r
83 (notmuch-lib.el) called from notmuch-mua-get-quotable-parts (in
\r
84 notmuch-mua.el); and so does not get included.
\r
86 Making the match case-insensitive `fixed' the problem.
\r
88 I don't know whether content-types are allowed to be upper-case but I
\r
89 seem to have several mails where they are. I am also not sure whether
\r
90 the correct fix is in the emacs code, or in the cli reply format
\r
91 (i.e. perhaps the reply format should lower-case the content-type).
\r
97 PS Sorry Adam for the duplicate: I sent from a wrong address (my fault
\r