53/b4efca5eefb2f0ac7403d76a9cc6ec081b291b

   1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5  by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888386DE0231\r
   6  for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  9 Feb 2016 07:36:31 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -0.056\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011,\r
  12   DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,\r
  13  RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652,\r
  14  UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled\r
  15 Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  16  by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  17  with ESMTP id tQdDZNUw4DiH for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  18  Tue,  9 Feb 2016 07:36:29 -0800 (PST)\r
  19 Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com\r
  20  [74.125.82.52]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CAE96DE021E for\r
  21  <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  9 Feb 2016 07:36:29 -0800 (PST)\r
  22 Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id g62so28615601wme.0\r
  23  for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 07:36:29 -0800 (PST)\r
  24 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
  25  d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;\r
  26  h=to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:mime-version\r
  27  :content-type; bh=Ie2gHwnT8zm9Yc2tnkm5DvOg3xwNJMLkPA9/EYH/gfM=;\r
  28  b=YhUYJ9Sm2q+rmP5z7ZlVyhodQXxPCrk/XsyhOcjxEQU+6cC1PLms6XeBnMiQoktUDo\r
  29  Ejir05PB8IAZBx4E0HnRqqpNFzjO7Mi6ccpghYIzSOS6Zbakh9S7tV+BNE0Ksz/IgCmI\r
  30  wEFQpedbLEInwr2Wk4FlK1XX7oRDse3g9p/xa0/+iF8DQCvMxnDp5R+2MB68Pv60R03q\r
  31  buUh0P6xy302bItIGAkrdA0AUGBhjs7og5T5/h/VS8LuSvQZtVl9hkmd7DjdFCBLjgUl\r
  32  D5GTKcMta8wyvkF3Wry0Q6PosqSfKlLAS1c4UvZjWItqgs/RrLGklfiNAog/cSIFcAnp\r
  33  TE5g==\r
  34 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
  35  d=1e100.net; s=20130820;\r
  36  h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date\r
  37  :message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
  38  bh=Ie2gHwnT8zm9Yc2tnkm5DvOg3xwNJMLkPA9/EYH/gfM=;\r
  39  b=dNZsrzdV4FkxeEee90/29DhjCK2G2YD1NHG4eNJ2v+8j2eP2lfolHNK31L1mRTplpc\r
  40  424lh2+/OiZYeigLS7ImqQtSL6EoC6n/Jtbio9P2NrKwdYfoGqX2TlxjqQ7MsD+Ig8rD\r
  41  bn8HBdt/uYnDWlO55HtCdN/4CjbBwCtCavtEDAPa4DN6V2Af0zCVrz0LA8aat+5+CvZu\r
  42  q6DFdWqWc68ws27dLacSovrBIPoEj6/2hM85Pf/yereMD6XuEZh5+FXSuN9mp+AIVG00\r
  43  ZzhmfaBy5/9kZ9KFn6MGh+/U5TP9d33rFzGoG+w1yNffaiUuBjxVWWM8+b+JzdlxwlQi\r
  44  +chA==\r
  45 X-Gm-Message-State:\r
  46  AG10YOT/N9aLtofwHZusyKfC5fINAcz04Y28BzXQwiggkZkHEv0CsK6pSbW4RhWwBlB7jQ==\r
  47 X-Received: by 10.28.97.135 with SMTP id v129mr5692813wmb.90.1455032186545;\r
  48  Tue, 09 Feb 2016 07:36:26 -0800 (PST)\r
  49 Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net\r
  50  ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227])\r
  51  by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m67sm18003955wma.10.2016.02.09.07.36.24\r
  52  (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
  53  Tue, 09 Feb 2016 07:36:24 -0800 (PST)\r
  54 Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local])\r
  55  by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 01530576;\r
  56  Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:36:23 +0000 (UTC)\r
  57 To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,\r
  58  David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org>,\r
  59  notmuch@notmuchmail.org, 810784@bugs.debian.org\r
  60 Subject: Re: [Gaudenz Steinlin] Bug#810784: should match email adress case\r
  61  insensitive when sending encrypted mail\r
  62 In-Reply-To: <m2a8na4zze.fsf@heart-of-gold.hh.sledj.net>\r
  63 References: <87egdm4ujh.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca>\r
  64  <874mee7k88.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>\r
  65  <m2io1y513m.fsf@heart-of-gold.hh.sledj.net>\r
  66  <m2a8na4zze.fsf@heart-of-gold.hh.sledj.net>\r
  67 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>\r
  68 Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:36:23 +0000\r
  69 Message-ID: <m21t8l6glk.fsf@dme.org>\r
  70 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  71 Content-Type: text/plain\r
  72 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  73 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20\r
  74 Precedence: list\r
  75 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  76  <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  77 List-Unsubscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  78  <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  79 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/>\r
  80 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  81 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  82 List-Subscribe: <https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  83  <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  84 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:36:31 -0000\r
  85 \r
  86 On Mon, Feb 08 2016, David Edmondson wrote:\r
  87 > On Mon, Feb 08 2016, David Edmondson wrote:\r
  88 >> On Fri, Jan 15 2016, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:\r
  89 >>> So where is the case-insensitive lookup happening?  Is this a bug in\r
  90 >>> mml-mode, or in notmuch-emacs?\r
  91 >>\r
  92 >> It's caused by behaviour in mml2015.el (hence upstream).\r
  93 >>\r
  94 >> `mml2015-epg-check-user-id' uses `equal' to compare the recipient from\r
  95 >> the composition buffer with the addresses from the matching key.\r
  96 >>\r
  97 >> The simplest way to get the desired behaviour would be to `downcase'\r
  98 >> both strings before comparing.\r
  99 >\r
 100 > Reported as bug#22603 in emacs.\r
 101 \r
 102 Fixed in the emacs-25 branch.\r