1 Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8B2431FC0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 8 May 2014 05:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id 5x6EwDQjTHoU for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 8 May 2014 05:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net
\r
18 [87.98.215.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C92D431FAE
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 8 May 2014 05:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim
\r
23 4.72) (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
\r
24 id 1WiNAn-00073y-6i; Thu, 08 May 2014 12:11:37 +0000
\r
25 Received: (nullmailer pid 25553 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 08 May 2014
\r
27 From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
\r
28 To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, =?utf-8?B?WMSrY8Oy?= <xico@atelo.org>,
\r
29 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
30 Subject: Re: pkg-config zlib check in 3c13bc
\r
31 In-Reply-To: <m2mweuhcna.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
32 References: <20140506194025.GA17097@coyotlan.Tlalpan>
\r
33 <m2mweuhcna.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
34 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
\r
35 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
36 Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 21:11:07 +0900
\r
37 Message-ID: <87lhucv5b8.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
\r
39 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
40 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
41 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
43 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
44 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
45 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
46 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
47 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
48 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
50 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
51 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
52 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 12:12:59 -0000
\r
54 Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> writes:
\r
57 > But, I'd like suggest alternate option to create a test c program
\r
58 > and test whether it compiles (analogous to what there is already
\r
59 > done with many other checks) -- this same would apply to fdatasync()
\r
63 I agree in principle, but I'm not sure it's detectable at compile time,
\r
64 since the option we need is passed as a string (boo!).
\r
66 I guess the ZLIB_VERNUM hack would be preferable to adding platform
\r
67 specific checks to configure. But note you'd need somehow to find
\r
70 See my other patch for fdatasync.
\r