4d/0c644436f3247947a8a72354e827a418a595c0

   1 Return-Path: <madduck@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08397431FBC\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:58:55 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: -1.982\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.982 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.617,\r
  12         BAYES_00=-2.599] autolearn=ham\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id h+H8Tgh105-y for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:58:54 -0800 (PST)\r
  17 Received: from clegg.madduck.net (clegg.madduck.net [193.242.105.96])\r
  18         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1991431FAE\r
  19         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:58:53 -0800 (PST)\r
  20 Received: from lapse.rw.madduck.net (unknown\r
  21         [IPv6:2404:130:0:1000:20a:e4ff:fe30:4316])\r
  22         (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))\r
  23         (Client CN "lapse.rw.madduck.net",\r
  24         Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK))\r
  25         by clegg.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A2401D409C;\r
  26         Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:58:46 +0100 (CET)\r
  27 Received: by lapse.rw.madduck.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
  28         id 8F838756; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:58:47 +1300 (NZDT)\r
  29 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:58:47 +1300\r
  30 From: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>\r
  31 To: Ben Gamari <bgamari@gmail.com>\r
  32 Message-ID: <20100218015847.GB3480@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
  33 Mail-Followup-To: Ben Gamari <bgamari@gmail.com>,\r
  34         notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  35 References: <20100215002914.GA22402@flamingspork.com>\r
  36         <20100217012101.GD8249@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
  37         <1266418124-sup-6308@ben-laptop>\r
  38         <3wd3a0z7jjv.fsf@mhdcelk-nx01.amd.com>\r
  39         <1266435265-sup-5024@ben-laptop>\r
  40         <20100217235211.GC2628@lapse.rw.madduck.net>\r
  41         <1266453115-sup-7880@ben-laptop>\r
  42 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  43 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;\r
  44         protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE"\r
  45 Content-Disposition: inline\r
  46 In-Reply-To: <1266453115-sup-7880@ben-laptop>\r
  47 X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'\r
  48 X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux squeeze/sid kernel 2.6.32-1-686 i686\r
  49 X-Spamtrap: madduck.bogus@madduck.net\r
  50 X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!\r
  51 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)\r
  52 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at clegg\r
  53 X-Virus-Status: Clean\r
  54 Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  55 Subject: Re: [notmuch] Mail in git\r
  56 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  57 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  58 Precedence: list\r
  59 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  60         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  61 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  62         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  63 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  64 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  65 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  66 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  67         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  68 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:58:55 -0000\r
  69 \r
  70 \r
  71 --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE\r
  72 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
  73 Content-Disposition: inline\r
  74 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  75 \r
  76 also sprach Ben Gamari <bgamari@gmail.com> [2010.02.18.1339 +1300]:\r
  77 > Yes, it would be linear in number of tags. I suppose if messages\r
  78 > weren't stored in the top-level tree nodes, then it would still be\r
  79 > linear, although with a slope equal to the reciprocal of the fan-out.\r
  80 > This has the potential to be very reasonable performance-wise.\r
  81 \r
  82 Messages are never stored in tree nodes; all these do are store\r
  83 references to objects (blobs) holding messages. I bet you know this,\r
  84 but I just wanted to make it explicit.\r
  85 \r
  86 So retagging is really just writing a new tree with a modified list\r
  87 of references.\r
  88 \r
  89 --=20\r
  90 martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/\r
  91 =20\r
  92 "no survivors? then where do the stories come from I wonder?"\r
  93                                                -- captain jack sparrow\r
  94 =20\r
  95 spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net\r
  96 \r
  97 --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE\r
  98 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="digital_signature_gpg.asc"\r
  99 Content-Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)\r
 100 Content-Disposition: inline\r
 101 \r
 102 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
 103 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
 104 \r
 105 iEYEAREDAAYFAkt8ntcACgkQIgvIgzMMSnXhkwCfSxEGsZFvyXkwDXzK2PP/Rao8\r
 106 pT4AnAq/CixXcojo66E7t79LFV8FGT6d\r
 107 =5GeK\r
 108 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
 109 \r
 110 --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE--\r