1 Return-Path: <racin@free.fr>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5076B431FAE
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:37:28 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
9 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
10 with ESMTP id ewI4An7xTx8z for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
11 Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:37:27 -0800 (PST)
\r
12 Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.3])
\r
13 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7190431FBC
\r
14 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:37:25 -0800 (PST)
\r
15 Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07160818127;
\r
17 Sun, 27 Dec 2009 19:37:17 +0100 (CET)
\r
18 Received: from UNKNOWN (imp5-g19.priv.proxad.net [172.20.243.135])
\r
19 by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CB9818143;
\r
20 Sun, 27 Dec 2009 19:37:14 +0100 (CET)
\r
21 Received: by UNKNOWN (Postfix, from userid 0)
\r
22 id B114237501D5C; Sun, 27 Dec 2009 19:37:14 +0100 (CET)
\r
23 Received: from ([82.239.207.166]) by imp.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP
\r
24 for <racin@172.20.243.55>; Sun, 27 Dec 2009 19:37:14 +0100
\r
25 Message-ID: <1261939034.4b37a95a9a99e@imp.free.fr>
\r
26 Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 19:37:14 +0100
\r
28 To: Kan-Ru Chen <kanru@kanru.info>
\r
29 References: <1261148449.4b2b9921f3ab1@imp.free.fr>
\r
30 <87eimsyxpo.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
31 <1261649236.4b333d54a22d3@imp.free.fr>
\r
32 <877hs93dyk.fsf@anar.kanru.info>
\r
33 In-Reply-To: <877hs93dyk.fsf@anar.kanru.info>
\r
35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
\r
36 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
\r
37 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.8
\r
38 X-Originating-IP: 82.239.207.166
\r
39 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 Subject: Re: [notmuch] First attempt to add smart completion in
\r
42 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
43 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
\r
45 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
46 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
47 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
48 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
49 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
50 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
51 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
52 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
53 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
54 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:37:28 -0000
\r
56 Well, then it's useful for [subject, from, to], right? :)
\r
57 In the future, other prefix terms, like tags, could also be completed this way.
\r
61 Quoting Kan-Ru Chen <kanru@kanru.info>:
\r
63 > On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:07:16 +0100, racin@free.fr wrote:
\r
64 > > OK, I had a problem using this #!#)($! webmail client. Here's the patch.
\r
68 > Is completion of headers useful right now? AFAIK, notmuch does not index
\r
69 > headers other than [subject, from, to].
\r
71 > Completion of keywords is still great. Thanks for this patch :)
\r
76 > Kan-Ru Chen | http://kanru.info
\r
78 > Q: Why are my replies five sentences or less?
\r
79 > A: http://five.sentenc.es/
\r