4b/1d2ad78bbe5a58c983aaf79c19ecae4d5bc263

   1 Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FB8429E25\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:27:55 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
   9 X-Spam-Score: 0\r
  10 X-Spam-Level: \r
  11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]\r
  12         autolearn=disabled\r
  13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
  14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  15         with ESMTP id lED0JDBc4mkz for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  16         Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:27:55 -0800 (PST)\r
  17 Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108])\r
  18         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C497D431FD0\r
  19         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:27:54 -0800 (PST)\r
  20 Received: from [192.168.1.91] (adsl-74-242-247-77.rmo.bellsouth.net\r
  21         [74.242.247.77])\r
  22         by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6B93F970\r
  23         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:27:52 -0500 (EST)\r
  24 Message-ID: <4EF9D5E8.4050203@fifthhorseman.net>\r
  25 Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:27:52 -0500\r
  26 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>\r
  27 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111120 Icedove/8.0\r
  28 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  29 To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  30 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Introduce a generic tree-like abstraction for MIME\r
  31         traversal.\r
  32 References: <1323027100-10307-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
  33         <1323460468-4030-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
  34         <1323460468-4030-3-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
  35         <87k46572f7.fsf@gmail.com> <20111224034500.GA1927@mit.edu>\r
  36 In-Reply-To: <20111224034500.GA1927@mit.edu>\r
  37 X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3\r
  38 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;\r
  39         protocol="application/pgp-signature";\r
  40         boundary="------------enig0CF343C17A4FA2E8E65344DD"\r
  41 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  42 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
  43 Precedence: list\r
  44 Reply-To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  45 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  46         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  47 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  48         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  49 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  50 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  51 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  52 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  53         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  54 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:27:58 -0000\r
  55 \r
  56 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)\r
  57 --------------enig0CF343C17A4FA2E8E65344DD\r
  58 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\r
  59 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  60 \r
  61 On 12/23/2011 10:45 PM, Austin Clements wrote:\r
  62 > Quoth Dmitry Kurochkin on Dec 10 at  3:25 am:\r
  63 >> +           /* For some reason the GMimeSignatureValidity returned\r
  64 >> +            * here is not a const (inconsistent with that\r
  65 >> +            * returned by\r
  66 >> +            * g_mime_multipart_encrypted_get_signature_validity,\r
  67 >> +            * and therefore needs to be properly disposed of.\r
  68 >> +            * Hopefully the API will become more consistent. */\r
  69 >>\r
  70 >> Ouch.  In gmime 2.6 this API has changed, but looks like the\r
  71 >> issue is still there.  Is there a bug for it?  If yes, we should\r
  72 >> add a reference to the comment.  Otherwise, we should file the\r
  73 >> bug and then add a reference to the comment :)\r
  74 >=20\r
  75 > It looks like they're both non-const in 2.6 (which makes more sense to\r
  76 > me).  I updated the comment to mention this.\r
  77 \r
  78 Here's the bug report where this was discussed with upstream, fwiw:\r
  79 \r
  80   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D640911\r
  81 \r
  82         --dkg\r
  83 \r
  84 \r
  85 --------------enig0CF343C17A4FA2E8E65344DD\r
  86 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
  87 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature\r
  88 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"\r
  89 \r
  90 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  91 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
  92 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/\r
  93 \r
  94 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJO+dXoXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w\r
  95 ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwRUU1QkU5NzkyODJEODBCOUY3NTQwRjFD\r
  96 Q0QyRUQ5NEQyMTczOUU5AAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpEJUQAKkrIZvaQujPSzboPkibd01o\r
  97 sYNVyHfZ7k9/oHMqfb+lV5yNG2wdG7zPP8TKMnPVMOd915Exy4WImeEtShgRogV7\r
  98 sp/JFTX84qDfJ78kPPEp74gk2i8vu7BhRte54abxCOs+HAj+cnmE7mgxl1o/Scpe\r
  99 hVFLuTbbpOELNuoWDmG58Whci8mV2rLhaMl4og86IJgxxEMpwCd1b8KpBV1QnYvV\r
 100 fWBjuISxU24CiPCF3+rKIFPGuLiWzbE1fmclkhHwq2rGuHzmGrqfqUStUMX65WlR\r
 101 Rjl7+QwPnAlhkRJF4jpG8ZFPXM48ZXWcuhK5zCi3Mf0FG7toa9JFHe5viK/K+ZhD\r
 102 FDP0Ju/vTNG9WUNK04b3xZsuIIjJrwY0oxQmPso/dci2o4alDhwNMci72EYB1tYC\r
 103 N8ToYfU3Hy1GkHZHWzOv+7kQakcQhrGEkAIK9y7tNsc/STaxdOWmeBHYep0UYXXw\r
 104 QyS/MB7GxB8lNye+nbvXaMzi/3wU86rm3RZTACuPsNPs1bBz0Y1FVwzs8Vrma9ad\r
 105 gv8x5kf8LhOoSDn/GTtrqfxyrzveDHT1PzfOJbo2BjAv5OqDfUf+d95WWdKWNKmF\r
 106 3vxEVZMa6qOz67pcD7XjftwSkzkctXRrpUWeuDwmh3ICmVR4rjbiOMBD7KOSzigl\r
 107 RV/4dL48Mj7weT/YOdRP\r
 108 =bIIL\r
 109 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
 110 \r
 111 --------------enig0CF343C17A4FA2E8E65344DD--\r