1 Return-Path: <public@plane.gmane.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBC2429E26
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id xo6-m5BQpr9p for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 X-Greylist: delayed 901 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra;
\r
19 Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:59:09 PDT
\r
20 Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
\r
21 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
22 (No client certificate requested)
\r
23 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ABA1431FB6
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
\r
26 (envelope-from <public@plane.gmane.org>) id 1R0Tqd-0003eh-No
\r
27 for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:44:03 +0200
\r
28 Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44])
\r
29 by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
\r
30 (envelope-from <matthias.guedemann@googlemail.com>)
\r
31 id 1R0TqZ-0003RU-De; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:43:59 +0200
\r
32 Received: by bkar4 with SMTP id r4so6253553bka.17
\r
33 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
\r
34 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
\r
35 d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
\r
36 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
\r
37 :mime-version:content-type;
\r
38 bh=cCwtumVJmm2zbHpRtGldO0SXNH2a0+Mstd8ZxBauerU=;
\r
39 b=ObOz7ZjWYzPI9nMr6fiOvyZILDD6Ojagmps2TjS2f/fMll0Jbdxh6xAQSRJwhu6MTA
\r
40 EJG3IjxCHSYIULFmAZlqeG6wDd4z4QdDD9pge66IUl5bhkQRWJlqhwnJ0/G+Zr0UE3yR
\r
41 TOF4vGPjAJoUp9HoEPfOUC5ny6KqBEp+tLaXE=
\r
42 Received: by 10.204.157.16 with SMTP id z16mr1956014bkw.163.1315208630889;
\r
43 Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
\r
44 Received: from localhost (pc44es043.cs.uni-magdeburg.de [141.44.32.152])
\r
45 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y3sm3154896bkw.4.2011.09.05.00.43.49
\r
46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
47 Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
\r
48 From: matthias.guedemann@googlemail.com
\r
49 To: David Bremner <public-david-1j+SLnlVNwXR7s880joybQ@plane.gmane.org>,
\r
50 public-notmuch-gxuj+Tv9EO5zyzON3hdc1g@plane.gmane.org
\r
51 Subject: Re: [PATCH] adds getline and getdelim to notmuch.sym if not provided
\r
53 In-Reply-To: <87fwkbvf9s.fsf@zancas.localnet> (David Bremner's message of
\r
54 "Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:28:47 -0300")
\r
55 References: <87k49v12i5.fsf@pc44es141.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>
\r
56 <87fwkbvf9s.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
57 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix)
\r
58 Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:43:37 +0200
\r
59 Message-ID: <87aaajcu3a.fsf@usby.cde.ovgu.de>
\r
61 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
62 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:21:55 -0700
\r
63 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
64 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
66 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
67 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
68 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
70 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
71 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
72 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
73 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
74 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
75 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 07:59:10 -0000
\r
82 > Can you let me know if my version of the patches is OK on OpenBSD?
\r
84 yes it works well on OpenBSD5.0-current, thanks a lot,
\r