Re: [PATCH 02/11] test: New tests for Emacs charset handling
[notmuch-archives.git] / 47 / 3b7563012abe8a2ee94e8afdf6ab59fad916be
1 Return-Path: <daniel@schoepe.org>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53988431FBC\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:32:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.8\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id 0VhKw3k8NoiW for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:32:29 -0700 (PDT)\r
18 Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com\r
19         [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
20         (No client certificate requested)\r
21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFE15431FAF\r
22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:32:28 -0700 (PDT)\r
23 Received: by bkcjk13 with SMTP id jk13so1391332bkc.26\r
24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:32:27 -0700 (PDT)\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=schoepe.org; s=google;\r
26         h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
27         :mime-version:content-type;\r
28         bh=SQvZ9x4F1ohKHqsy/aH6Q6UYd6/OIq3yYvoTlwzzj30=;\r
29         b=PKwFd/epL6P6vbDnn+fiMNi02zS3Zil4SzhbggPdse3nd4p1mX139biKCcaID9e7Vi\r
30         LYWXtO/SZ/0IM7TZuI268HgrFPOLjNt36h6U/CG1miyQTcw6BbhXRFENH4M1uUh2WOV5\r
31         uOmAadevGGXegu+K4MKI3cg/boJSvXzmWwyns=\r
32 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
33         d=google.com; s=20120113;\r
34         h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
35         :mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state;\r
36         bh=SQvZ9x4F1ohKHqsy/aH6Q6UYd6/OIq3yYvoTlwzzj30=;\r
37         b=k3S6UN1k8tHDJQTC2cRYG+WmmKWGpiayfy1IH191GqMzwYz/ZXKHEvjbTTyhTAzJRm\r
38         bhfT2NwcUmKPQ3Iy0uEIF/GgcWi1nzQdgSdEZ8kX09OSRZYj83PSntE5LJfComWTz8uB\r
39         e157iihUZ50cugUbxIz35lObjDclMKyL2hJrAV8JhZXfh4kt2xAJMfBJgtaluQIGCDMM\r
40         xrl+SoAXXKB78dQ8b7exZODDrnvAQSRY7s8vopRfZ712HfMMO+twtgBbituHW7bvJOsK\r
41         tVCyL1d4J6HUtXMo68i/8SrMxv9VujZyXxDah34Ay+W7qc1heWV+buZblaDXqYpdwXYd\r
42         DmLA==\r
43 Received: by 10.205.129.8 with SMTP id hg8mr7892842bkc.25.1340821947115;\r
44         Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:32:27 -0700 (PDT)\r
45 Received: from localhost (dslb-178-004-027-161.pools.arcor-ip.net.\r
46         [178.4.27.161])\r
47         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h18sm56004290bkh.8.2012.06.27.11.32.25\r
48         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
49         Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:32:26 -0700 (PDT)\r
50 From: Daniel Schoepe <daniel@schoepe.org>\r
51 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,\r
52         Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
53 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all)\r
54 In-Reply-To: <87obo4zljq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
55 References: <1340815565-21083-1-git-send-email-cworth@cworth.org>\r
56         <87obo4zljq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
57 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13+57~gd352961 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.95.1\r
58         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
59 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:32:18 +0200\r
60 Message-ID: <87bok4hah9.fsf@schoepe.localhost>\r
61 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
62 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
63         micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
64 X-Gm-Message-State:\r
65  ALoCoQkEe37XFUNImcrSWn2rKBFfoWIxEpA7v3xTv0XckLVunchoxcO5ZHgd3EE7+7uemaHz2Zyk\r
66 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
67 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
68 Precedence: list\r
69 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
70         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
71 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
72         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
73 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
74 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
75 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
76 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
77         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
78 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:32:30 -0000\r
79 \r
80 --=-=-=\r
81 Content-Type: text/plain\r
82 \r
83 On Wed, 27.06.2012 19:55, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:\r
84 > I actually rebound these keys immediately after the release, so I'm\r
85 > perfectly happy to change back.\r
86 \r
87 Same here.\r
88 \r
89 I think the ratio of cases where I wanted to reply to all\r
90 participants instead compared to just to the sender is something like\r
91 10:1.\r
92 \r
93 Moreover, it's significantly easier to just remove recipients from the\r
94 headers than adding them, since one may no longer know who they are\r
95 after pressing reply, for example in big threads on mailing lists.\r
96 \r
97 So these are my bikeshedding arguments for this change, but the last\r
98 point is not _that_ subjective, I hope.\r
99 \r
100 Cheers,\r
101 Daniel\r
102 \r
103 --=-=-=\r
104 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
105 \r
106 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
107 Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)\r
108 \r
109 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP61GyAAoJEIaTAtce+Z+JPDsP/2eay10J1zXjnpECk+YxTox9\r
110 d45mU35uxKXHBGoYc7j4tPPcv5S/IEDjz/P7unXzNkLOUcE+LXVfrm93L34h49Ad\r
111 vxVv3k9NkEDSTeGzzf2mrFUpNHsJ3eQITS6XdvINh2PATnT1G2mYKE3Gr+le0yIV\r
112 6i4D/+n6Pv+VVBW6c95s7nxoBqbZb2Fb5SP8XrG+MGcLwsuLlTwqGbJs2Dos1CUS\r
113 3vfzqInHzrkhU32YENQ3IQOIMRD7G+Tu4sdRvzpAVSrlhkIJjstNzWUrRS731gvD\r
114 3JBGUxbjJQne+sWR/Miy4901U4Cb3lriTlOpR2Evl33LagvBA5E3NKcU/7C14fxH\r
115 VNf9WLNJcdbGvIlcRzqeFTwjMYxnuen4d1ykQ0z0kdii2VgKDz0VXRJdXaihNGQq\r
116 jZX4setCIKlS0TWpcRB+H3xpU7rwYgJuJ7CrHWIlXESeteS2bVdaEMU6QZAnqve6\r
117 1HSpNKDrYktg4j/4P23okoya/EHmTXHcDWaPOyCVPSrQq3xzBsR3MmhU/3HHX2dz\r
118 jkwmgAQ0ERg4xAJ1NfHiYOoZkGwFk+U0kcw6eDri1Kjvi0eRMZNjFWuu7nonFo01\r
119 LFNsmCq0hAzDh2bJ77bCCZ0VqEsqE1mm0enmvQ4zPvGwq5osFGXH+Hv2m35P96S9\r
120 8XYGmDFmlRB9E8wd1C2Q\r
121 =7mRk\r
122 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
123 --=-=-=--\r