Re: [PATCH] emacs: wash: make word-wrap bound message width
[notmuch-archives.git] / 46 / cd4909868006a610ec68314fdf92f657d0c66e
1 Return-Path: <daniel.schoepe@googlemail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747BC431FD0\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 06:34:05 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.789\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]\r
14         autolearn=disabled\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
16         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
17         with ESMTP id GUwSyYZPtZFX for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
18         Mon, 11 Jul 2011 06:34:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
19 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com (mail-fx0-f46.google.com\r
20         [209.85.161.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
21         (No client certificate requested)\r
22         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97275431FB6\r
23         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 06:34:04 -0700 (PDT)\r
24 Received: by fxh19 with SMTP id 19so3953529fxh.19\r
25         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 06:34:02 -0700 (PDT)\r
26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
27         d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;\r
28         h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date\r
29         :message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
30         bh=QEltEqCEGxkoYUm17YHUlkNkYTMpmLpBHUQsGw0IAuA=;\r
31         b=Ae9oaO37apFIUvusFB7+otHLlNLEszD7/93T6g8Mse4tQ6yHDRBSRLq/Lxa1Et7mxd\r
32         URRsjMteLD7UYQOuyLxRwPsfMphMupc8pTkgKPZqwT8HC+9KIz6aJvlo8FTJ8EX6JvTd\r
33         vU7205J5nhHJDgQbIVwMT+FCpa6E3cpqMfUM4=\r
34 Received: by 10.223.6.77 with SMTP id 13mr7700485fay.41.1310391242770;\r
35         Mon, 11 Jul 2011 06:34:02 -0700 (PDT)\r
36 Received: from localhost (dslb-088-069-141-194.pools.arcor-ip.net\r
37         [88.69.141.194])\r
38         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k26sm9285802fak.0.2011.07.11.06.34.00\r
39         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
40         Mon, 11 Jul 2011 06:34:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
41 From: Daniel Schoepe <daniel.schoepe@googlemail.com>\r
42 To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@sspaeth.de>, Sander Boer <sanderboer@mauc.nl>\r
43 Subject: Re: notmuch Digest, Vol 20, Issue 57\r
44 In-Reply-To: <8762n9x88f.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
45 References: <mailman.5.1309146869.12973.notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
46         <cuozkl367o2.fsf@mauc.nl> <87wrg5905c.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
47         <87wrg3pyra.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
48         <CACEMMeewjcM1Vo=uq_wrhe_5Z+OESsJD_29-D7z5JxT6Mvq7qA@mail.gmail.com>\r
49         <87fwmjqmav.fsf@tredergarh.home.box> <8762n9x88f.fsf@SSpaeth.de>\r
50 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-329-g0b5d38d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
51         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
52 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:33:50 +0200\r
53 Message-ID: <87vcv90wn5.fsf@gilead.invalid>\r
54 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
55 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
56         micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
57 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
58 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
59 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
60 Precedence: list\r
61 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
62         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
63 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
64         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
65 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
66 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
67 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
68 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
69         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
70 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:34:05 -0000\r
71 \r
72 --=-=-=\r
73 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
74 \r
75 On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:22:24 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@sspaeth.de>=\r
76  wrote:\r
77 > > Support for tags is mentioned in the RFC for IMAP, but it's optional. As\r
78 > > far as I know, must servers today support them though.\r
79 >=20\r
80 > I can't speak for Gmail, but all major servers, ie Cyrus, Dovecot, and\r
81 > even Exchange seem to handle tags just fine.\r
82 \r
83 I just realized that this was a quite misleading typo, that should have\r
84 read "As far as I know, _most_ servers today support them though".=20\r
85 \r
86 I'd be very suprised if Gmail didn't support them. And even if not, one\r
87 could work around that by having a hypothetical tag synchroniser handle\r
88 Gmail differently and use their tagging mechanism:\r
89 \r
90 http://code.google.com/apis/gmail/imap/#x-gm-labels\r
91 \r
92 This would also have the added benefit of notmuch tags showing up in the\r
93 other gmail-tag-aware applications, like the web-interface.\r
94 \r
95 Another issue brought up by DraX on IRC is that IMAP keywords don't\r
96 handle unicode. (Although the RFC specifies that every character except\r
97 some excluded special characters are allowed, so I guess it's\r
98 implementation-dependent).\r
99 \r
100 I think the best way to go would be to extend both maildir and\r
101 offlineimap somehow to store tags and then store them as IMAP keywords /\r
102 gmail-labels in the case of Gmail on the server.\r
103 \r
104 Cheers,\r
105 Daniel\r
106 \r
107 --=-=-=\r
108 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
109 \r
110 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
111 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
112 \r
113 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOGvu/AAoJEIaTAtce+Z+JJQoQAK1dCwmomYrIoD4HYtlDqZPD\r
114 Mf6eHoP3FW2JvdwsiH6F3Nk0CCqPGuqhFgG/h458YmWZSz2K25SgvR3WPmtsrFlD\r
115 b1SrQYE/mFdrvyodlZvaWMk69V7hKaP7e0pPNhijei3UfvameJCKMIYAOMQPg0Et\r
116 nR/RhX86CLetfpg1IWUGkgzUe6fBh4uJbFLatS8XlioW74oxiQIaXRYvtjUlvFmO\r
117 wqEEoOXqdKu7SgnpF35HQHBaBKwVXRxjI11B3MAOZgeOWitm3QzmbHycr0kXBg2i\r
118 Iq1p9qdV0YqhjGItwPtycAgtQr+Ov0CGzQry6F4jzp8ClwRLj4X5BCEaXnDpsDhP\r
119 lUiI0K6FbvQhWuk6OoRK9Xap89T4hiBNvKX/scfLbfQransdQ96heSzXi48Z+ezI\r
120 47bJOOs4goDseTd6frxlh2E3yMcQCJ/y6QaUpo5TyTkgr9T2HzsmMsU4CbRQjEJw\r
121 P9p7ycpvZ/Wxthed8nEEmJPJdtGZmo5AUa3PAdqlMxZuZv5HlMa9k8dDVBpTNxy6\r
122 Op20MxSWtOAnp7bMvInA9ZTCltgiwUKTMV7DkiNw+g+k5T1nyDzYf+QmKeZwcDuf\r
123 G3x7B0VdAp2OwPUnxinQHIVmiPbFIQi8hGPz5iwbChUO5dQf6UVwph3GFn3/rLeH\r
124 sOnjHfu3e/8TCzHuURT+\r
125 =Uqxa\r
126 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
127 --=-=-=--\r