Re: [PATCH] emacs: wash: make word-wrap bound message width
[notmuch-archives.git] / 46 / b25e880ef56483544db1af4de547d2782b6e56
1 Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB817431FBD\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  2 Dec 2009 02:59:18 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
9         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
10         with ESMTP id E9qGikCAjaJ7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
11         Wed,  2 Dec 2009 02:59:18 -0800 (PST)\r
12 Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com (mail-bw0-f224.google.com\r
13         [209.85.218.224])\r
14         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E014E431FAE\r
15         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  2 Dec 2009 02:59:17 -0800 (PST)\r
16 Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so57693bwz.30\r
17         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:59:17 -0800 (PST)\r
18 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
19         h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:subject\r
20         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
21         bh=XGLIm12DwI55poQX1bCL+ixKBXjiAPiPziVTUvnz7GE=;\r
22         b=h4xANbLyKi9sfTZ8udXi7PqW5m7VTfrMWAf/BC478DwvKj99jBpJh06GzysoLfHKGd\r
23         n3HUYIfX9s5q5vbPNEtFCEBZfGrvYCalBDIQCzzD4DhD8Kb1enqpvEimAo0aazVlElyl\r
24         hyzowW+8gdGcOxz+g70XappPkfPv0/4i9d54U=\r
25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
26         h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id\r
27         :mime-version:content-type;\r
28         b=Yy5MnKDrcZE0TkpOyUVRE4FvwUGUa/PGR0L4Uw19yk4UQjC4ztOX+GSyptrCvobKij\r
29         ejJAA6AASo3w+kBhRuEWvUDbJF0DTL+Aww8hHdBpd0JEpJyuyKwI0E67kr5R8XYNBGuL\r
30         Wp0EA5vEPmecw6KVOvhRnGu9SAzbJWCPUR4NU=\r
31 Received: by 10.204.10.136 with SMTP id p8mr1041093bkp.56.1259751556850;\r
32         Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:59:16 -0800 (PST)\r
33 Received: from kunyang (vawpc43.ethz.ch [129.132.59.11])\r
34         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm1276327fkr.57.2009.12.02.02.59.14\r
35         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);\r
36         Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:59:15 -0800 (PST)\r
37 Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
38 From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>\r
39 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
40 In-Reply-To: <87bpii9j7o.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
41 References: <1258976966-22407-1-git-send-email-jed@59A2.org>\r
42         <1258999643-30742-1-git-send-email-jed@59A2.org>\r
43         <87bpii9j7o.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
44 Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:59:57 +0100\r
45 Message-ID: <87vdgp4p5e.fsf@59A2.org>\r
46 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
48 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Make search filters handle disjunctive\r
49         queries.\r
50 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
51 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
52 Precedence: list\r
53 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
54         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
55 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
56         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
57 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
58 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
59 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
60 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
61         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
62 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:59:18 -0000\r
63 \r
64 A patch for notmuch-search-filter follows, my change to\r
65 notmuch-search-filter-by-tag is not very useful since\r
66 notmuch-select-tag-with-completion does not allow a space to be\r
67 inserted.  I don't know how to get completion on multiple\r
68 space-separated terms.\r
69 \r
70 On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:56:59 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
71 > PS. Hmm... "notmuch reply" needs to be more clever to avoid duplicate\r
72 > addresses in the To: and Cc: lines. See above.\r
73 \r
74 Yes, uniquifying the headers actually requires some effort, unless I'm\r
75 missing something in the gmime API (which I've never looked at before).\r
76 \r
77 Jed\r