1 Return-Path: <james@jameswestby.net>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6C4431FC4
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:28:54 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619] autolearn=no
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id G9cVntvBWtnN for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:28:53 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from jameswestby.net (jameswestby.net [89.145.97.141])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5947431FBC
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:28:53 -0800 (PST)
\r
20 Received: from [131.203.102.171] (helo=flash)
\r
21 by jameswestby.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69)
\r
22 (envelope-from <james@jameswestby.net>)
\r
23 id 1NaMvv-0002QC-D0; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:28:47 +0000
\r
24 Received: by flash (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
25 id 022B8605C07; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:28:38 +1300 (NZDT)
\r
26 From: James Westby <jw+debian@jameswestby.net>
\r
27 To: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>, Jameson Rollins
\r
28 <jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
29 In-Reply-To: <20100128051252.GB12540@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
\r
30 References: <20100125162247.85F0F66FA8@aether.pioto.org>
\r
31 <87tyu9dfhs.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <1264523377-sup-6110@elise>
\r
32 <87aaw0vlvp.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
33 <20100128051252.GB12540@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
\r
34 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:28:38 +1300
\r
35 Message-ID: <87k4v2re61.fsf@jameswestby.net>
\r
37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
38 Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
39 Subject: Re: [notmuch] tag dir proposal [was: Re: Git as notmuch object
\r
41 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
42 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
44 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
45 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
46 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
47 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
48 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
49 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
50 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
51 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
52 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
53 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:28:54 -0000
\r
55 On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:12:52 +1300, martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> wrote:
\r
56 > also sprach Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> [2010.01.27.0603 +1300]:
\r
57 > > > This is getting involved.
\r
59 > > > Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these complex and
\r
60 > > > context-sensitive decisions be delegated to sub-processes? ala git hooks?
\r
62 > > I think this idea is completely independent of anything having to do
\r
63 > > with using git as a mail store. That's why I was trying to separate it
\r
64 > > into a separate thread.
\r
66 > I think he meant "notmuch hooks like you have hooks for Git too",
\r
67 > e.g. thread:755741d13573c7642761d2a175cb146d
\r
69 Are you trying to use thread: such that it could be passed to notmuch
\r
70 show to see the conversation?
\r
72 That's not going to work so well if so.
\r