1 Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CA5429E29
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id vBnDsX2NQ9zR for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from homiemail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcahe.dreamhost.com
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D08431FB6
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 Received: from homiemail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by homiemail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F5D1A8061;
\r
24 Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject
\r
26 :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
\r
27 content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=Q1WNnz7UFq2NtglFX2PNLf61Rgo
\r
28 OOzzxtYE90IHcdlAbMj7vBJPY4nsiXiRG3de2QeOzv6VTiLF9uLFZq3mV3S3p89g
\r
29 DoasI/Jd3R14UjJUt1OmX/GyExqYOZbu3EUT6aiI1UeY+U+1YV06YOM0EJaGys9k
\r
31 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to
\r
32 :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
\r
33 content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=wd3MJkpFDAapIZcCIc/Z3ESdxVA=; b=E
\r
34 P8TWXNADbnrk1l5kas1TD2phknbMAruMpNYhsBvzcyU15HJXZ6S620559qA5dW9h
\r
35 7Zy9p1bvZGzs5YGi+dTgKFsVaIzWxYVamcAGaiRn0isNjESyL9By5PeXXUcjBFj3
\r
36 1sJYymmRxkybwZLKxNNWriUjQblv3zAUQtp4vrJAo4=
\r
37 Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (mtec-hg-docking-1-dhcp-253.ethz.ch
\r
39 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
40 (No client certificate requested)
\r
41 (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de)
\r
42 by homiemail-a22.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1AB51A805F;
\r
43 Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
44 Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
\r
45 Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:34:57 +0200
\r
46 From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
47 To: patricktotzke@gmail.com, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
48 Subject: Re: [python] segfaults at Message.get_date
\r
49 In-Reply-To: <20110616215439.GA26997@brick>
\r
50 References: <20110616215439.GA26997@brick>
\r
51 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-233-gb404931 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
52 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
53 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:34:56 +0200
\r
54 Message-ID: <87boxxq833.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
56 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
57 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
58 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
59 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
61 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
62 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
65 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
66 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
68 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
70 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 06:35:02 -0000
\r
74 On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:54:39 +0100, Patrick Totzke wrote:
\r
75 > Unfortunately, as it segfaults, I don't get a stacktrace here.
\r
76 > The line that seems to cause the segfault is this one:
\r
77 > https://github.com/pazz/notmuch-gui/blob/master/alot/db.py#L181
\r
79 Just some followup. get_date() calls libnotmuch's:
\r
81 notmuch_message_get_date(...)
\r
83 and expects a "c_long" as result (notmuch.h says it returns time_t, so
\r
84 long should be appropriate, shouldn't it?)
\r
86 I had this segfault on me once, but it was not reproducable.
\r
88 I have no clue what's going on there, especially as it's not reliable reproducable.
\r
92 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
94 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
95 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
\r
97 iEYEARECAAYFAk369ZEACgkQVYX1jMgnoGIgWACbBgXyykiS3MTXx6xHxV2+oOBM
\r
98 rGcAnRRMhkwcekLSI8LzUYPxG4QgaBP3
\r
100 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r