1 Return-Path: <chrismgray@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E44431FD0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:09:50 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id PAjjI3N9Tb51 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:09:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.212.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9480D431FB6
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:09:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by vbal1 with SMTP id l1so5034410vba.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:09:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
26 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=nq/n5on21cKsPyn9vDPkpy6ZbcKYw6BPXJlEoQIbFzU=;
\r
29 b=B+bLM7IV0a/cfXec+vHKFVvwu7oajz5vWG+thoh93JhVJWqlDTYV0L4+VH2tsCkwm/
\r
30 gvxaBEFyYkzE1ITwX/IdfjiJjzUpt6ccelCWwq3X950pk/FtiwWqKPPOFBogldKNkWlK
\r
31 KqqB7AgFPlYTgH+z5AYKgnj1FI+9lPZF73JyA=
\r
32 Received: by 10.52.35.70 with SMTP id f6mr1434863vdj.84.1324397389007;
\r
33 Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:09:49 -0800 (PST)
\r
34 Received: from driftwood (S0106001f333bc36d.cg.shawcable.net. [68.144.78.164])
\r
35 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
\r
36 i12sm1652158vdj.14.2011.12.20.08.09.47
\r
37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
38 Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:09:48 -0800 (PST)
\r
39 From: Chris Gray <chrismgray@gmail.com>
\r
40 To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
41 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] emacs: Provide scaffolding so that the new `shr'
\r
42 HTML renderer can run.
\r
43 In-Reply-To: <cunpqfjxqhu.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
44 References: <1324309559-7993-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
45 <8762hbkas3.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
46 <cun62hbzllt.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
47 <8739cfjp2r.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
48 <cunpqfjxqhu.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
49 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+95~g2eb2694 (http://notmuchmail.org)
\r
50 Emacs/24.0.92.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
51 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:09:28 -0700
\r
52 Message-ID: <87zkeni5s7.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
54 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
55 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
56 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
59 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
61 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
66 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:09:50 -0000
\r
69 On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:33:01 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
\r
70 > On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:27:24 -0700, Chris Gray <chrismgray@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
71 > > On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:35:42 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
\r
72 > > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:38:36 -0700, Chris Gray <chrismgray@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
73 > > > > > + (makunbound 'gnus-summary-buffer) ; Blech.
\r
75 > > > > This is working around a bug in gnus. I think the better solution would
\r
76 > > > > be for gnus to fix the bug. The following patch against gnus works for
\r
77 > > > > me. (I have tried submitting it to the gnus bug list, but have not been
\r
78 > > > > able to check if it got through.)
\r
80 > > > I wonder if `boundp' is just a typo for `bufferp'?
\r
82 > > I originally thought so as well, but bufferp blows up if given an
\r
83 > > unbound variable and buffer-name blows up if given a string.
\r
85 > When would `gnus-summary-buffer' ever be unbound?
\r
87 In the optimal situation where we were able to use mm-decode without
\r
88 requiring gnus.el, then gnus-summary-buffer would be unbound.
\r