Re: [PATCH v4 16/16] add "notmuch reindex" subcommand
[notmuch-archives.git] / 3e / c98ca2e098ca31fcfb2a78f41a314a2724d366
1 Return-Path: <jinwoo68@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15958431FC7\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 10:59:17 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: 2.639\r
10 X-Spam-Level: **\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=1,\r
14         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
16         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
17         with ESMTP id oR7x846HAyhr for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
18         Mon,  2 Feb 2015 10:59:13 -0800 (PST)\r
19 Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com (mail-ie0-f170.google.com\r
20         [209.85.223.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
21         (No client certificate requested)\r
22         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2443431FC0\r
23         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2015 10:59:13 -0800 (PST)\r
24 Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id y20so19763413ier.1\r
25         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:59:13 -0800 (PST)\r
26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
27         h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id\r
28         :mime-version:content-type;\r
29         bh=MzTMiaPB+qiJrgSikZpe/M2YpynAClk/jq1xj099G4Q=;\r
30         b=MZac5NY4gZrElp8DwdNVBBzUwxdFczHO3e8xZmv+g5CzFItEU388Fp5e8huHIqvck/\r
31         ZgrHJhAV82tTIlmfkRxhq4GaJKoi4t/lq1eMc9XvWWvRixns5PBKKf4Y7TJqvVPKzTuJ\r
32         ee7WCfEtDp5lqG+v/jVX2GIK2HoEPKrbDDA5VQ2uJT08uvB0qh03wrUMsbeS5jdCSx+R\r
33         Ui6QBUSgsPOREjGs7MaZcy+nL1P3lk4jM4UEIbCYwhWVQQF+lIrydqcFcQpNTRiWcdO+\r
34         hVtLpbsHXtrZKsQStBDxrzAEHC1P8GAjwC6Dh5m3GrNnvDDfTtf40Pftne9Fn9oyv0Fk\r
35         Vfpw==\r
36 X-Received: by 10.42.120.82 with SMTP id e18mr15833210icr.2.1422903553469;\r
37         Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:59:13 -0800 (PST)\r
38 Received: from localhost ([172.19.60.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id\r
39         o143sm6470184ioo.14.2015.02.02.10.59.12\r
40         (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);\r
41         Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:59:12 -0800 (PST)\r
42 From: Jinwoo Lee <jinwoo68@gmail.com>\r
43 To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
44 Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Add a defcustom that specifies regexp for\r
45         blocked remote images.\r
46 In-Reply-To: <m2h9v5paxn.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
47 References: <1422567352-32647-1-git-send-email-jinwoo68@gmail.com>\r
48         <m2h9v5paxn.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>\r
49 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1\r
50         (x86_64-apple-darwin13.2.0)\r
51 Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:59:13 -0800\r
52 Message-ID: <yq65oapcqgvy.fsf@jinwoo-macbookair.roam.corp.google.com>\r
53 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
54 Content-Type: text/plain\r
55 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
56 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
57 Precedence: list\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
59         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
61         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
66         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 18:59:17 -0000\r
68 \r
69 Thanks for the review, guys.  Sent yet another patch.  BTW I'm not sure\r
70 if I should specify --in-reply-to when sending updates.\r
71 \r
72 -jinwoo\r