1 Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C038D431FAF
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id OUba0EULPlkw for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru-group.fi [87.108.86.66])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B56F431FAE
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501)
\r
21 id D214C68055; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:02:33 +0300 (EEST)
\r
22 From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
\r
23 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
24 Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>,
\r
25 Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
26 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] emacs: modify help message for
\r
27 notmuch-search-line-faces to reflect preferred "deleted" tag name.
\r
28 In-Reply-To: <87ehro44ba.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
29 References: <87vcoaywyu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
30 <1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
\r
31 <87iph06h72.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
32 <87ty0k4v5o.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
33 <m2ehrotg29.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
34 <87ehro44ba.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
35 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+113~gde05574 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
36 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
37 X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
\r
38 $[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
\r
39 !)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
\r
40 Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:02:33 +0300
\r
41 Message-ID: <m2vcl0gnw6.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
\r
43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
44 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
45 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
48 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
49 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
50 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
54 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
56 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:02:38 -0000
\r
58 On Mon, Apr 16 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
60 > On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:
\r
61 >> id:"1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net"
\r
63 >> Does just "delete" -> "deleted" change: the only question I have left
\r
64 >> is that should that be left as is, this change made, or just drop
\r
65 >> the "delete" coloring altogether ?
\r
67 > Sorry, yes, I suppose this patch should still be applied. Excludes for
\r
68 > "deleted" are the default, I believe, so if we are going to refer to it
\r
69 > in documentation we should probably be consistent.
\r
71 That said, the following change in nmbug repository
\r
73 D 1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net needs-review
\r
74 A 1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net trivial
\r
81 > On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
82 >> On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
83 >>> I think the rest of the series (which provides keybindings for
\r
84 >>> adding/removing the delete tag to messages/threads) is worthwhile
\r
85 >>> particularly now the exclude stuff is fairly complete (feedback at the
\r
86 >>> time looked positive).
\r
88 >> Sorry, I wish I could have purged all of these series from the list.
\r
89 >> After a very protracted discussion on the topic it was decided that
\r
90 >> notmuch will not support any delete tagging operations. Users who wish
\r
91 >> to do so can add support on their own:
\r
93 > I think my reaction here was a little strong. I'm not remembering how I
\r
94 > got the impression that there was more opposition to adding delete
\r
95 > keybindings than there was support. I suppose now that excludes work so
\r
96 > well one (not me) might consider revisiting the issue.
\r
99 > _______________________________________________
\r
100 > notmuch mailing list
\r
101 > notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
102 > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
\r