38/b49d4200c822a6f4ddce971d0e8e6eca2f96f8

   1 Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C840431FBD\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  2 Dec 2009 05:45:28 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
   9         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  10         with ESMTP id K-9l7YQcagwL for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  11         Wed,  2 Dec 2009 05:45:25 -0800 (PST)\r
  12 Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com (mail-bw0-f224.google.com\r
  13         [209.85.218.224])\r
  14         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82DC431FAE\r
  15         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed,  2 Dec 2009 05:45:24 -0800 (PST)\r
  16 Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so174338bwz.30\r
  17         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:45:23 -0800 (PST)\r
  18 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  19         h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:cc:subject\r
  20         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
  21         bh=/5Diqj7wbji6rOGs+qqdsLhlSpfcbFKo8BguxiMp2LU=;\r
  22         b=r6Vcw0FS594a3Vii00moMsDxoHG0AVbkQAPVjPcmbr9KODVMyhekWKvebcrnbeUhTx\r
  23         kDsGj0kMPtpF9kbz6hKshiV3RntjBFqCpQIihcCyVh/mLrzO5MH3r2m/ziAPgLgiNVj+\r
  24         DagEpkFYj45AOqDaGhJgBWhVvTgLL+U26ZTks=\r
  25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  26         h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id\r
  27         :mime-version:content-type;\r
  28         b=fvlNurKc5NKO1w3irL8BtQ0e1RTv93MyXC7GIFQAXQhH0xu24sgrFST1hAcGpa2Usq\r
  29         j/y+xiqb0xwKldQDRj2lHtAfnSa1SCgpkxvnlkUQSZX+gYRjPwa1OrLIXzHw0KDy11V5\r
  30         aLlTd88qT+yfsiPHGhUhmK6nk9wv2LCx4ah6c=\r
  31 Received: by 10.204.33.6 with SMTP id f6mr158105bkd.37.1259761523459;\r
  32         Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:45:23 -0800 (PST)\r
  33 Received: from kunyang (vawpc43.ethz.ch [129.132.59.11])\r
  34         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 1sm1456580fkt.33.2009.12.02.05.45.21\r
  35         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);\r
  36         Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:45:22 -0800 (PST)\r
  37 Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
  38 From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>\r
  39 To: Jan Janak <jan@ryngle.com>\r
  40 In-Reply-To: <20091202131808.GC4411@ryngle.com>\r
  41 References: <1258976966-22407-1-git-send-email-jed@59A2.org>\r
  42         <1258999643-30742-1-git-send-email-jed@59A2.org>\r
  43         <87bpii9j7o.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87vdgp4p5e.fsf@59A2.org>\r
  44         <20091202131808.GC4411@ryngle.com>\r
  45 Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:46:04 +0100\r
  46 Message-ID: <874oo9fq03.fsf@59A2.org>\r
  47 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
  49 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  50 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Make search filters handle disjunctive\r
  51  queries.\r
  52 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  53 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
  54 Precedence: list\r
  55 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  56         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  57 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  58         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  59 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  60 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  61 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  62 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  63         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  64 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:45:28 -0000\r
  65 \r
  66 On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:18:08 +0100, Jan Janak <jan@ryngle.com> wrote:\r
  67 > I haven't been really following this thread in detail. What is that you need\r
  68 > from notmuch-select-tag-with-completion? To be able to process a list of tags\r
  69 > separated by spaces? Maybe I could help you with that.\r
  70 \r
  71 No, it would need to take input separated by spaces, now I just get `[No\r
  72 match]' when I try to enter a space.  I think it's just not how\r
  73 completing-read works, the idea would be for the user to be able to type\r
  74 \r
  75   shorttag and not long<TAB>\r
  76 \r
  77 which would complete to\r
  78 \r
  79   shorttag and not longboringtagname\r
  80 \r
  81 The point of my patch was to be able to filter using arbitrary\r
  82 expressions where every non-operator, i.e. `and', `or', `not', `(', and\r
  83 `)', is interpreted as a tag name.  Is there an easy way to accept this\r
  84 input without sacrificing completion?\r
  85 \r
  86 Jed\r