1 Return-Path: <pieter@praet.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6237429E26
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id LBRlh+mdOBNp for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:47 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com
\r
18 [74.125.82.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client
\r
19 certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
\r
20 303C9431FB6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:47 -0800
\r
22 Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so1946254wgb.2
\r
23 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:46 -0800 (PST)
\r
24 Received: by 10.181.11.163 with SMTP id ej3mr7782597wid.4.1326388125929;
\r
25 Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:45 -0800 (PST)
\r
26 Received: from localhost ([109.131.126.209])
\r
27 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v28sm6434502wbo.18.2012.01.12.09.08.45
\r
28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
29 Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:08:45 -0800 (PST)
\r
30 From: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>
\r
31 To: Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
32 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Rebase of Pieter's "set test prereqs"
\r
33 In-Reply-To: <87aa7vawek.fsf@thor.loria.fr>
\r
34 References: <1320176954-4897-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>
\r
35 <1321454035-22023-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net>
\r
36 <8739dneqra.fsf@praet.org> <87aa7vawek.fsf@thor.loria.fr>
\r
37 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+115~gadd29f6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
38 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
\r
39 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:07:06 +0100
\r
40 Message-ID: <87lipcluit.fsf@praet.org>
\r
42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
43 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
44 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
46 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
47 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
48 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
49 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
50 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
51 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
53 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
54 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
55 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:08:48 -0000
\r
57 On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:14:11 +0100, Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net> wrote:
\r
58 > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:50:17 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
\r
59 > > On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:33:49 +0100, Thomas Jost <schnouki@schnouki.net> wrote:
\r
62 > > > This is another rebased version of Pieter's series to add GPG and Emacs as test
\r
63 > > > prereqs, plus some additions on my own. (Rebased and posted as requested by
\r
69 > > Although... you may have misread (or maybe I mistyped :), but what I
\r
70 > > actually intended [1] was for you to rebase *only* your fixes on top of
\r
71 > > my rebased series (e.g. see "tjost-fixes.patch" in att), so you could
\r
72 > > receive proper credit for cleaning up my mess.
\r
74 > Oh, ok, I must have misread that :)
\r
76 > Right now your patches don't apply cleanly on master (conflict in patch
\r
77 > 3 due to commit 5964a7), and I think that Dmitry's patches [1] may be a
\r
78 > better way to handle prereqs. So I probably won't send those patches
\r
79 > until we decide which approach is the way to go.
\r
81 > [1] id:"1321494986-18998-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com"
\r
84 Yup, Dmitry's solution is much more elegant!
\r
86 > > Also, while my apprehension [2,3] re the inclusion of the SCREEN/DTACH
\r
87 > > prereq in patches #4,5,6 didn't have much merit (it's an all-or-nothing
\r
88 > > affair anyways), the issue [3] in patch #5 @ "Reply within emacs" still
\r
89 > > stands: `sed' will run unconditionally, and treat "EMACS" as an input
\r
90 > > file. (see "sed-prereq-fix.patch" in att).
\r
92 > Nice catch with this sed issue. Looks like I need to be more careful
\r
93 > when replacing "OUTPUT" with "EMACS OUTPUT"...
\r