1 Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E64B40DBC8
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:01:14 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id rn1l2RsuF8bQ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:01:03 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com
\r
19 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A053E40DDC8
\r
20 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:01:03 -0800 (PST)
\r
21 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so952311wyb.26
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:01:03 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by 10.227.28.10 with SMTP id k10mr7838536wbc.215.1289926861933;
\r
24 Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:01:01 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com
\r
27 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h29sm913958wbc.9.2010.11.16.09.01.00
\r
28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
\r
29 Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:01:01 -0800 (PST)
\r
30 Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
31 id E61A8594058; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:58:32 +0000 (GMT)
\r
32 To: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
33 Subject: Re: Improved search speed by 2.5X
\r
34 In-Reply-To: <20101116161842.GA2439@mit.edu>
\r
35 References: <20101116161842.GA2439@mit.edu>
\r
36 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-6-g1e370fc (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
37 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
38 From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
\r
39 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:58:32 +0000
\r
40 Message-ID: <87bp5pxl1j.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>
\r
42 Content-Type: text/plain
\r
43 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
44 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
46 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
47 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
48 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
49 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
50 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
51 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
52 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
53 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
54 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
55 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:01:14 -0000
\r
57 On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:18:43 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrote:
\r
58 > [1] Except for 2 emacs tests that depend on author order. What order
\r
59 > are matched authors *supposed* to be in?
\r
61 In IRC cworth confirmed that he considered the current behaviour a bug,
\r
62 which is to say that the authors should be sorted by first occurrence in
\r
67 David Edmondson, http://dme.org
\r