1 Return-Path: <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD8A429E21
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:57:09 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id GjJX3D7GffTA for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:57:05 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBA97431FB6
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:57:04 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: by bkaq10 with SMTP id q10so6715713bka.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:57:02 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
26 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=NDj+QXd/GA4Er5sj3bqHDyeeRhveIyPofH4pLYBeLM8=;
\r
29 b=X+Vox5ycniADD8mBOpzEruRXPDsTuFr3ubBy8InB8ASyPqjSJRsSAGJ3jUoLtR9CPS
\r
30 ldzQVlFHMeQgBfFZ6j6G6S0mkzJMovKcYttEOv4oCzZA1CNlMRRxAKx+EeB6PStKaBkc
\r
31 F8+mmpnBfOvw7g/O1S2arCX1FnMzEjhO2bki0=
\r
32 Received: by 10.205.118.13 with SMTP id fo13mr10305923bkc.123.1321253822636;
\r
33 Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:57:02 -0800 (PST)
\r
34 Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21])
\r
35 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dq2sm29653600bkb.11.2011.11.13.22.57.00
\r
36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
37 Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:57:01 -0800 (PST)
\r
38 From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
39 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
40 David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,
\r
41 Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
42 Subject: Re: [PATCH] add `tag:' prefix to `--output=tags' results
\r
43 In-Reply-To: <8762in39w7.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
44 References: <877hbiep5g.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
45 <1309422029-22924-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>
\r
46 <87k475mktx.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca>
\r
47 <8762in39w7.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
48 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9+68~g5845e29 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
49 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
50 Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:56:48 +0400
\r
51 Message-ID: <87pqgv42fj.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
57 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
58 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
59 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
61 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
62 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
64 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
65 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
66 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:57:12 -0000
\r
68 On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:00:56 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
\r
69 > On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 10:17:30 -0500, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
\r
70 > > What do people think about this change? Personally I will have change
\r
71 > > some scripts to not add "tag:", but it isn't that big of a deal.
\r
73 > I would actually prefer to see the prefixes removed from the messages
\r
74 > and threads output rather than see it added to the tags output. I think
\r
75 > that's the way to make the output most consistent. When I ask for
\r
76 > --output=messages I'm asking for the message ids of the messages, not
\r
77 > for search terms for the messages. I think it should be up to the
\r
78 > consumer to add the prefix if they would like to construct search terms
\r
79 > based on the output.
\r
87 > My 2 cents. I would be happy to provide a patch to make that change if
\r
88 > people agree to that behavior.
\r
91 > _______________________________________________
\r
92 > notmuch mailing list
\r
93 > notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
94 > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
\r