1 Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F4C418C37
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01]
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id QSCXxS7vOuH7; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470C5431FC1;
\r
19 Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
\r
21 id EB7D2568DE4; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
\r
22 From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
\r
23 To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>, Olly Betts <olly@survex.com>,
\r
24 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
25 Subject: Re: [PATCH] allow to not sort the search results
\r
26 In-Reply-To: <87wrw4sw2d.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
27 References: <1271226655-5672-1-git-send-email-Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
28 <20100414065525.GA11770@jdc.jasonjgw.net>
\r
29 <87hbnebhg0.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
30 <loom.20100415T144148-25@post.gmane.org>
\r
31 <87eiifj433.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87wrw4sw2d.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
32 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:09:52 -0700
\r
33 Message-ID: <87d3xsjtbz.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
35 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
\r
36 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
\r
37 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
38 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
40 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
41 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
42 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
43 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
44 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
45 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
46 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
47 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
48 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
49 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:09:54 -0000
\r
52 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
54 On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:56:58 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.d=
\r
57 > > 1: Introduce NOTMUCH_SORT_UNSORTED
\r
58 > > 2: Introduce notmuch search --sort=3Dunsorted
\r
59 > > 3: Make notmuch tag not sort results by date
\r
61 > > #2 is the one I am least sure about, I don't know if there is a use case
\r
62 > > for notmuch search returning unsorted results. But 1 & 3 are useful at
\r
65 > May I advocate patches 1 & 3 for inclusion in 0.3? I've been using this
\r
66 > in my tree without problems. patch 2 is left to your judgement as to
\r
67 > whether a "--sort=3Dunsorted" is useful for notmuch search. (it will
\r
68 > probably rather benefit from a --sort=3Drelevance, I guess).
\r
72 I've pushed out 1 & 3 now. I can't find any use case where
\r
73 =2D-sort=3Dunsorted is interesting for "notmuch search".
\r
75 If people want to start playing with --sort=3Drelevance then that could be
\r
76 very interesting. (For me, and for almost all email searches I do, I
\r
77 almost always want date-based sorting. But if I start having trouble
\r
78 finding things with particular queries, I might want to play with the
\r
79 relevance-based stuff.)
\r
84 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
\r
86 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r
87 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
\r
89 iD8DBQFLz4XA6JDdNq8qSWgRAh2lAJ0Qu7lsHv8mdb+g1V87nCdeFjTaCwCfedo9
\r
90 76xqBMNLFNjq53Gn4tjUajc=
\r
92 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
\r