Re: [feature request] emacs: use `notmuch insert` for FCC
[notmuch-archives.git] / 27 / dbcc270123766a86454857519b80a9ce47f338
1 Return-Path: <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7E3431FBF\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:25 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -2.29\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
14         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
15         with ESMTP id TeK-DaS5WlQl for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
16         Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:25 -0800 (PST)\r
17 Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu\r
18         [131.215.239.19])\r
19         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED07431FBD\r
20         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:24 -0800 (PST)\r
21 Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
22         by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E85066E011C;\r
23         Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:24 -0800 (PST)\r
24 X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new\r
25 Received: from finestructure.net (gwave-212.ligo.caltech.edu\r
26  [131.215.114.212])     (Authenticated sender: jrollins)        by earth-doxen-submit\r
27  (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7199066E01AE;  Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:19 -0800 (PST)\r
28 Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)\r
29         id 546A3506; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:19 -0800 (PST)\r
30 From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>\r
31 To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>\r
32 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] search: Support automatic tag exclusions\r
33 In-Reply-To: <cunmx9lmj63.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
34 References: <1326258173-21163-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
35         <1326496024-14403-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
36         <1326496024-14403-4-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu>\r
37         <87wr8tsvit.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
38         <cunfwfg57uh.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
39         <20120116192836.GC16740@mit.edu>\r
40         <CA+eQo_3xxuhgUUXWXWyVD1LFhvhkw2psbA3ZnFnZk=BjjHXy8w@mail.gmail.com>\r
41         <cunpqeir912.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
42         <20120117203211.GQ16740@mit.edu>\r
43         <cunsjjdmmm8.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
44         <877h0pqtom.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
45         <cunmx9lmj63.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>\r
46 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+63~g6965a07 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1\r
47         (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)\r
48 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:18 -0800\r
49 Message-ID: <87ty3sq1y1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>\r
50 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
51 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
52         micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
53 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Jeremy Nickurak <jeremy@nickurak.ca>\r
54 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
55 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
56 Precedence: list\r
57 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
58         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
59 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
60         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
61 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
62 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
63 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
64 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
65         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
66 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:51:25 -0000\r
67 \r
68 --=-=-=\r
69 \r
70 On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:52:52 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:\r
71 > I agree that as long as no keys are pre-bound it will make little\r
72 > difference. That just transfers the discussion to the thread about\r
73 > adding the bindings, which seems silly.\r
74 \r
75 I think that's ok.  The tag exclusion is in, which is great.  The\r
76 next question, of whether we should setup excludes by default, is\r
77 intimately related to whether or not we support key bindings to add\r
78 those tags.  So I think it's fine to transfer the rest of this\r
79 discussion to that thread.\r
80 \r
81 jamie.\r
82 \r
83 --=-=-=\r
84 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
85 \r
86 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
87 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
88 \r
89 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPFxSnAAoJEO00zqvie6q8aicP/1xoqg11rIZtc4y2Mra91h05\r
90 L4e3foTcJJ7TC/111FOwJTL7X2laHxLvLyIt19EfaVX7beaEcjtgD5p7Eh53NE7y\r
91 lA8Y5V2U2p4bgHdAowTbpNupqI6SOQ8ZMW4ywFKOTwNuKX+8CD7BUwZh4nnBpfGT\r
92 KctTqspi5wh6p2wDvbfWAE5kQIztmDROv9JK4YI8VU9o6xGtbcXwzX/6QwZM8RGt\r
93 Ip3CyhnbFhrvDmOAIqgt5lR50c54ayvAkbXJ3IRj3yw75Yd6KlgDDmt0NOiERAGt\r
94 9JJC6m5nBPsj3wN5rsWK0oHPrOlWpdbIwcjLOwaw6Gah7TCwWbg3ZtkFI4ekCrKR\r
95 m1S15kz7JmoYPeUIdEjrq639etC/5gihIkgeDvdPpzONM6VsdgMzk3gCw4P53nap\r
96 vnMexXRTKJzMSjijUnaR99yZym2aELs+9lOdku55u1j2USqBqm5t5gEIvJE6OPAC\r
97 ufn/+8p8nSu1nzzxyz1zGpytNB9Eza0HmY7AAWje4C/9RZq0VOgRNmcQ/F77dYnm\r
98 CGHxyR48MN/zoduBTiNSx/5iKlU/lx3bZtUeSO3uJoUZlMdbVi2UfZNOLvvEyEfH\r
99 EfIjtKloFKZCXf9TzHr8NLMrXf2z032DVTPPYWN1JxXjNtVd87IcCUG/2Aa2dyJ9\r
100 DFUN+3pcEYmikWtJqO9y\r
101 =/tGS\r
102 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
103 --=-=-=--\r