1 Return-Path: <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE48429E5B
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id ZddAWQk6pYh1 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95727429E32
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so609496bwg.26
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
\r
26 h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id
\r
27 :mime-version:content-type;
\r
28 bh=IZ1P8BnULa4i0FOq7D6b3lazSNgpJqwCnpODM/kty2s=;
\r
29 b=P+Gp2gNF66hdfSKmZhWEayvCEJGqSXxRS7DniMB6FpKzs7se89KDr3CvcOwlbPlVYe
\r
30 gbt56GSM07szs1t/n6ingQ/QvYu5q3Ri7Qwm6gS+6rLt2Xb7BDZLXd6xhEA4vUMjbkTK
\r
31 aVfx19UNg9ekjWqqr/znsIrNcTCECSnzcFnYw=
\r
32 Received: by 10.204.151.204 with SMTP id d12mr58511bkw.127.1309299758242;
\r
33 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
\r
34 Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21])
\r
35 by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm578959bka.11.2011.06.28.15.22.36
\r
36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
\r
37 Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
\r
38 From: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
39 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
40 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] test: use emacsclient(1) for Emacs tests
\r
41 In-Reply-To: <87hb798uz7.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
42 References: <1309236311-2162-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
43 <1309236311-2162-10-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
\r
44 <87hb798uz7.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
\r
45 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-289-ge053759 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
\r
46 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
47 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:22:31 +0400
\r
48 Message-ID: <87wrg5wq8o.fsf@gmail.com>
\r
50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
51 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
52 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
54 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
55 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
56 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
57 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
58 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
59 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
60 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
61 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
62 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
63 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:22:40 -0000
\r
65 On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:14:04 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
\r
66 > On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:45:11 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
67 > > Before the change, every Emacs test ran in a separate Emacs
\r
68 > > instance. Starting Emacs many times wastes considerable time and
\r
69 > > it gets worse as the test suite grows. The patch solves this by
\r
70 > > using a single Emacs server and emacsclient(1) to run multiple
\r
73 > Great, great stuff, Dmitry!
\r
75 > I've pushed everything earlier than this patch in this series.
\r
77 > And I'd be fine pushing this one as well, (if Austin cares strongly
\r
78 > about not polling, I'll invite him to improve things from here).
\r
80 > Except that things don't actually work for me with this patch applied.
\r
82 > I'm not getting consistent results from the test suite, (I have seen
\r
83 > both "2 tests failed" and "5 tests failed"). Here are the failures from
\r
84 > a recent run with 5 failures:
\r
86 > FAIL decryption, --format=text
\r
87 > FAIL decryption, --format=json
\r
88 > FAIL decryption, --format=json, --part=4
\r
89 > FAIL decrypt attachment (--part=5 --format=raw)
\r
90 > FAIL decryption failure with missing key
\r
92 > In each case the actual output was either empty, or an empty JSON
\r
93 > array. In some cases notmuch also gave an error:
\r
95 > Error: search term did not match precisely one message.
\r
97 > Are you not getting these same failures?
\r
100 Ouch. I never saw these. Do you get these in crypto tests only?
\r
105 > Let me know what else I can do to investigate this.
\r
110 > carl.d.worth@intel.com
\r