1 Return-Path: <fcarrijo@yahoo.com.br>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40AF4196F0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
\r
13 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
\r
14 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
\r
15 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
16 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
17 with ESMTP id rgt8cyIW3sLJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
18 Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
\r
19 Received: from n17.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (n17.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57ABD431FC1
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: from [68.142.200.224] by n17.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
\r
24 29 Mar 2010 14:59:11 -0000
\r
25 Received: from [68.142.201.248] by t5.bullet.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
\r
26 29 Mar 2010 14:59:11 -0000
\r
27 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp409.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
\r
28 29 Mar 2010 14:59:11 -0000
\r
29 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 877680.44838.bm@omp409.mail.mud.yahoo.com
\r
30 Received: (qmail 98354 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2010 14:59:11 -0000
\r
31 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br;
\r
32 h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
\r
33 b=sJhtdNI2Q3mMD45UGmr2MPQIIOu4GjHJ5lqtruhyL9fJMIen68I9OUkudQPFAyJ0HQIO2vyt1cyi/gb3+XQVatCKT4cY87GEUef+JU1hhOCACniG58q1xai9uUpTuSEsQnSkLDLqqPQ1iNhU6FKDdyOwv+dDmlvYZBuby4DPFHQ= ;
\r
34 Received: from 201-67-50-50.gnace703.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br
\r
35 (fcarrijo@201.67.50.50 with plain)
\r
36 by smtp137.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2010 07:59:11 -0700 PDT
\r
37 X-Yahoo-SMTP: NgkT36eswBAymTD26_IxCjMQ0A5a
\r
38 X-YMail-OSG: uC4E4CQVM1mQlnd_SN.CXikqXTV0dR7ROfFQjzWp5l9Mk7G5_GOLk1ZwCw_WvFNBNUwj2gKNfIvyfnG188ebOf.AHcj18fph8JF3dJtnXqI64qC_kAnaX0BuIvyZ5uTSMMzCWms6Fs3aC5amcXcX48OK1SsbctvVW7vau79_SrzC1b7WWwnzDPYlNS1UEUshW838_Koh7DzfCFUTOBh9lLTFwDrWIDjWTbRPlKK1taVKIXaDdqXh_Z0cCg3rkeVJNZdaj.XMClChwv_vlaxf4tTTYNVAMqNGBUgrww--
\r
39 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
\r
40 From: Fernando Carrijo <fcarrijo@yahoo.com.br>
\r
41 To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>,
\r
42 "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
\r
43 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
44 In-Reply-To: <87634fv65u.fsf@uf.hh.sledj.net>
\r
45 References: <87iq8o76r8.fsf@uf.hh.sledj.net>
\r
46 <87aatvnnjx.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87vdciub41.fsf@uf.hh.sledj.net>
\r
47 <87eij4v0nj.fsf@yahoo.com.br> <87634fv65u.fsf@uf.hh.sledj.net>
\r
48 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:59:09 -0300
\r
49 Message-ID: <87634f898i.fsf@yahoo.com.br>
\r
51 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
52 Subject: Re: [notmuch] JSON based emacs UI
\r
53 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
54 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
56 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
57 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
59 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
60 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
61 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
63 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
65 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:59:13 -0000
\r
67 David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
\r
68 > On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo <fcarrijo@yahoo.com.br> wrote:
\r
69 > > David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
\r
70 > > > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
\r
71 > > > message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redisplay
\r
72 > > > helped (just pushed).
\r
74 > > > Toggling the visibility of headers is done with 'h'. There's currently
\r
75 > > > no way to do that by pressing 'RET' somewhere. (You can also toggle the
\r
76 > > > body with 'b'.)
\r
78 > > I fear this is not correct. I cloned notmuch from Carl's git repository,
\r
79 > > and whenever I press 'RET' while the point is over the subject line, the
\r
80 > > result is the same as pressing 'h': the subject information gets toggled.
\r
82 > Is this considered a feature that blocks people from switching to the
\r
85 As long as I'm concerned, no.
\r
92 > David Edmondson, http://dme.org
\r