1 Return-Path: <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F14F429E5B
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:49:06 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
\r
13 NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id K9M9p5LW442v for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:49:04 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6])
\r
19 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55B00429E25
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:49:04 -0800 (PST)
\r
23 Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40])
\r
24 by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
\r
25 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
26 id 1RsNRb-0004D7-Nu; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:49:00 +0000
\r
27 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223]
\r
29 by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69)
\r
30 (envelope-from <m.walters@qmul.ac.uk>)
\r
31 id 1RsNRb-0005oE-FB; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:48:59 +0000
\r
32 From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
\r
33 To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
34 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] emacs: Allow the indentation of content to be
\r
36 In-Reply-To: <cunobtjaliz.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
37 References: <id:"1327486729-18052-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org">
\r
38 <1327999620-14595-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
39 <1327999620-14595-4-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
\r
40 <87d39zu9v4.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
41 <cunobtjaliz.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
\r
42 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+137~gd5f6ffb (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
\r
44 Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:50:06 +0000
\r
45 Message-ID: <87lionsa8h.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
\r
47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
48 X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223
\r
49 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :)
\r
50 X-QM-Body-MD5: abd42748fdc252aa090b5c5145b2bc75 (of first 20000 bytes)
\r
51 X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8
\r
52 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: -
\r
53 X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to
\r
55 spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam.
\r
56 This message scored -1.8 points.
\r
57 Summary of the scoring:
\r
58 * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
\r
60 * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org]
\r
61 * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail
\r
62 provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com)
\r
63 * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
\r
65 * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
\r
66 X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean
\r
67 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
68 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
70 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
71 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
72 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
73 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
74 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
75 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
76 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
77 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
78 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
79 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:49:06 -0000
\r
81 On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:23:32 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
\r
82 > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:15:11 +0000, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:
\r
83 > > Hi I have reviewed the patch series within the limits of my lisp
\r
84 > > knowledge. Patch 1: is rather beyond my lisp so I won't comment on that
\r
85 > > (and I have never tried crypto): Patches 2-5 look fine with one
\r
86 > > bikeshed and one query for my own understanding.
\r
90 > > The bikeshed is that I agree with Jani in
\r
91 > > id:"CAB+hUn8KhXHTRCdrLe0cT=8mdtz9ZntPFf13mq0iCo4CX=B-Jg@mail.gmail.com"
\r
92 > > that I would prefer to reserve '>' for saving a file.
\r
94 > '<' is 'remove indent', or 'look to the left'.
\r
95 > '>' is 'toggle truncation', or 'look to the right'.
\r
97 > (I'm not overly worried about this - would 't' be more acceptable?)
\r
99 I personally would prefer 't' but it is easy to remap so it really isn't
\r