23/5c27e59fee58516c460bb673c4dd883cfa315e

   1 Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
   2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
   4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
   5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FE2431FC0\r
   6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:26:21 -0800 (PST)\r
   7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
   8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
   9         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
  10         with ESMTP id hZ2X1Qij+NKg for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
  11         Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:26:21 -0800 (PST)\r
  12 Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com (mail-bw0-f224.google.com\r
  13         [209.85.218.224])\r
  14         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D23431FAE\r
  15         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:26:20 -0800 (PST)\r
  16 Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so1775139bwz.30\r
  17         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:26:20 -0800 (PST)\r
  18 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  19         h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:subject\r
  20         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;\r
  21         bh=Bkzzsslsm1ZBvuXu8+1Z95PVJj3VydaMkdg3nwseg+k=;\r
  22         b=eFnzhLIF0rPyS+SdyKBxy/7s4Gfqu4nBeIOk+gtOQ14Q5GR3zer8BxxPRQLj/SAsyD\r
  23         dS66KTueKKBIajOUna1gni52tyX9SybX3cgXB6zycuvOwat9el7NHpawfTMssWfFEzME\r
  24         D91ZYB9lTiaB/p5h4vDs1DWuxoKuF3SYOO4TU=\r
  25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;\r
  26         h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id\r
  27         :mime-version:content-type;\r
  28         b=v2l5sMZFLm9beb5hyG+Rl0unLQexXLP7L8zDG+dORtAWadGFZQnKMxGSFk5td+eHBd\r
  29         0Gapp5b2U7G4Y1c/WSCCwVo7pvHBrR4vCzaojV7aekh7j+D4RvmvOF76px5r4R5VIEhM\r
  30         h4Id+yE4mrxaTQ6ltP1nBWXRd0+JldilSD+Oc=\r
  31 Received: by 10.204.160.73 with SMTP id m9mr2494746bkx.214.1259436380083;\r
  32         Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:26:20 -0800 (PST)\r
  33 Received: from kunyang (vawpc43.ethz.ch [129.132.59.11])\r
  34         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm918225fxm.10.2009.11.28.11.26.18\r
  35         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);\r
  36         Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:26:19 -0800 (PST)\r
  37 Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>\r
  38 From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>\r
  39 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  40 In-Reply-To: <87vdgupm8w.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  41 References: <877htavdn1.fsf@59A2.org> <87vdgupm8w.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
  42 Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:26:52 +0100\r
  43 Message-ID: <87638uv4ar.fsf@59A2.org>\r
  44 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
  45 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";\r
  46         micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"\r
  47 Subject: Re: [notmuch] Mailing list Reply-To munging and notmuch reply\r
  48 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
  49 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
  50 Precedence: list\r
  51 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
  52         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
  53 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
  54         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
  55 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
  56 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
  57 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
  58 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
  59         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
  60 X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:26:21 -0000\r
  61 \r
  62 --=-=-=\r
  63 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
  64 \r
  65 On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:55:43 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
  66 > On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:05:06 +0100, Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org> wrote:\r
  67 > > Handling this is a bit messy, I think we want the current behavior\r
  68 > > unless To matches Reply-To, in which case we use From and Reply-To.  If\r
  69 > > this is indeed the least bad behavior, I will make a patch for it.\r
  70 >=20\r
  71 > Oh, I really like that. The condition there avoids breaking legitimate\r
  72 > uses of Reply-To, (such as the cairo lists I run, where cairo-commit@\r
  73 > has no user-generated From:---just a single automated address, but has\r
  74 > Reply-To: set to the cairo@ list instead so that replies to committed\r
  75 > patches go to the right place).\r
  76 \r
  77 I'm not sure I follow (at least not when comparing to the sanitized\r
  78 headers shown in the online archives).  Could you send me one of these\r
  79 headers?\r
  80 \r
  81 When mailing lists munge, do they ever just add to that field (RFC-2822\r
  82 says Reply-To may contain multiple addresses)?\r
  83 \r
  84 Jed\r
  85 \r
  86 --=-=-=\r
  87 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature\r
  88 \r
  89 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  90 Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)\r
  91 \r
  92 iEYEARECAAYFAksReXwACgkQU7Rz1O1Q6otceACdGZYfrUMChJ1lhe0gkPimfmsX\r
  93 sF0AoLFst/aHiUIDi+uXvIarwjyn+kzk\r
  94 =VCtV\r
  95 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
  96 --=-=-=--\r