Re: [PATCH] lib: reword comment about XFOLDER: prefix
[notmuch-archives.git] / 23 / 1d3663518a2079628902d681e99a0c2fe0219a
1 Return-Path: <patricktotzke@googlemail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2146C431FD0\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:04:01 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id TRGgTBLoQ+EC for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:03:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
18 Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com\r
19         [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
20         (No client certificate requested)\r
21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38B0B431FB6\r
22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:03:59 -0700 (PDT)\r
23 Received: by wyh22 with SMTP id 22so4262190wyh.26\r
24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:03:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;\r
26         d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;\r
27         h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version\r
28         :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;\r
29         bh=Ho3udYCg+3L+Kadmom82Si1AUZtpVw8wEYvzp9sPPYU=;\r
30         b=ldiD0Up9xW293mtiFFfoVac/tgcG4ALTCy7V2lV280A9EY7ZNwM/vwaC/DpQQf/DdB\r
31         bdkpYLMFzIk8BDkyD2oU3wTi3VZZG4MIc4NE1t0f+8lMDKAJc2GfwjtNUmK7XBaplmRV\r
32         eNiS5c77RhvaTLiRph6FueCP6TmKnqPHIyx/w=\r
33 Received: by 10.216.132.169 with SMTP id o41mr735583wei.83.1310547837785;\r
34         Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:03:57 -0700 (PDT)\r
35 Received: from brick.lan (cpc1-sgyl2-0-0-cust47.sgyl.cable.virginmedia.com\r
36         [80.192.18.48])\r
37         by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v81sm1086051wer.47.2011.07.13.02.03.55\r
38         (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);\r
39         Wed, 13 Jul 2011 02:03:56 -0700 (PDT)\r
40 Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:03:52 +0100\r
41 From: Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@googlemail.com>\r
42 To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= <ukleinek@strlen.de>\r
43 Subject: Re: Encodings\r
44 Message-ID: <20110713090352.GA22558@brick.lan>\r
45 References: <87zkkkx6am.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <20110712212958.GA17348@brick.lan>\r
46         <20110713070447.GA14254@strlen.de>\r
47 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
48 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;\r
49         protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk"\r
50 Content-Disposition: inline\r
51 In-Reply-To: <20110713070447.GA14254@strlen.de>\r
52 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)\r
53 Cc: Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@googlemail.com>,\r
54         Notmuch developer list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
55 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
56 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
57 Precedence: list\r
58 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
59         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
60 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
61         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
62 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
63 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
64 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
65 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
66         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
67 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:04:01 -0000\r
68 \r
69 \r
70 --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk\r
71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1\r
72 Content-Disposition: inline\r
73 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable\r
74 \r
75 Hi Uwe,\r
76 \r
77 On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:04:47AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote:\r
78 > > But as Carl sais, we cannot guarantee that a tag is utf8 encoded anyway.\r
79 > I think it would be right to enforce that tags are utf-8 encoded.\r
80 > Otherwise the users get strange results if they change their locale.\r
81 \r
82 I agree that it would be very nice indeed if it was safe to assume\r
83 all tags are utf-8. But i also see that it's a bit of an effort\r
84 to ensure this as all UI's would have to explicitly recode\r
85 stuff that isn't utf-8.\r
86 It seems to be a conciously made design decision to allow\r
87 other encodings for tags, which is up for discussion f course.\r
88 All I'm saying is that the bindings should conform. And if it's=20\r
89 not safe to assume utf-8 here, we shouldn't decode as such.\r
90 \r
91 I'm unsure what happens in all the new get_part() parts of the api.\r
92 If there, all mimepart-text is also returned as utf-8, it would only\r
93 be consistant to bend tag encodings to utf-8 also. But I doubt thats the ca=\r
94 se.\r
95 Can anyone clarify this?\r
96 /Patrick\r
97 \r
98 --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk\r
99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"\r
100 Content-Description: Digital signature\r
101 \r
102 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
103 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)\r
104 \r
105 iEYEARECAAYFAk4dX3gACgkQlDQDZ9fWxaoV9wCgjgfhYlTfw86MPGvW0dc+8NUH\r
106 ViQAoKM9QS5EXYpKlVj6IF2l2BkpDfDN\r
107 =jPkL\r
108 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\r
109 \r
110 --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--\r