Re: [PATCH] emacs: wash: make word-wrap bound message width
[notmuch-archives.git] / 22 / 790e245ca6bd6741a7b1924205141fa255979e
1 Return-Path: <marten@veldthuis.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA0E431FBC\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:54:23 -0800 (PST)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
9         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
10         with ESMTP id BXp+kbvUrrPr for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
11         Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:54:23 -0800 (PST)\r
12 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com\r
13         [66.111.4.25])\r
14         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DB2431FAE\r
15         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:54:23 -0800 (PST)\r
16 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41])\r
17         by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAE1B5A31;\r
18         Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:54:19 -0500 (EST)\r
19 Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160])\r
20         by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:54:19 -0500\r
21 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com;\r
22         h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;     s=smtpout; bh=q1JQ/Q9K/5VFrJvTONtqvF0A/wM=;\r
23         b=k2foQfdTPlyOV4Q0lDBztUhO/MU/EP9P6yDs5r7ajqOSOnlwUw6gnV36iqTdwMzO+9kME3hn88KutBWw1cIaBfmRc2czaMTzLTNsbjZzXHecaU5o26jdiU2VAvMkHZ3ZW6JHQOjFMpXvr7qpb78opGX1f14BDzESI67w3FytcWY=\r
24 X-Sasl-enc: 8lvUzYub6lqybgU5aT3VDWnVHyy2RJnwLeouzVCWCM8S 1260892458\r
25 Received: from veldthuis.com (marten.rgoc.rug.nl [129.125.147.35])\r
26         by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD2E34AF562;\r
27         Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:54:17 -0500 (EST)\r
28 Received: by veldthuis.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation);\r
29         Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:54:20 +0100\r
30 From: Marten Veldthuis <marten@veldthuis.com>\r
31 To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Mark Anderson <markr.anderson@amd.com>,\r
32         notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
33 In-Reply-To: <87ocm64ivu.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
34 References: <1260400470-sup-5775@testarossa>\r
35         <87ws0ug23f.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
36         <87ljha3avx.fsf@home.veldthuis.com>\r
37         <87ocm64ivu.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>\r
38 Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:54:20 +0100\r
39 Message-ID:\r
40  <87my1kkzbn.fsf@marten.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>\r
41 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii\r
43 Subject: Re: [notmuch] Threading\r
44 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
45 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12\r
46 Precedence: list\r
47 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
48         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
49 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
50         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
51 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
52 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
53 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
54 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
55         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
56 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:54:23 -0000\r
57 \r
58 On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:30:13 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:\r
59 > But I still have a hard time justifying user operations to manipulate\r
60 > threading. The whole point of threading is to make it faster to process\r
61 > and read messages. But manual operations like joining and splitting\r
62 > threads seem like the user just doing more work, and that *after* having\r
63 > read the messages. So that seems mostly backwards to me.\r
64 \r
65 By the way, Outlook & Exchange suck (or at least some versions do), and\r
66 don't seem to generate In-Reply-To and References: headers. Just got a\r
67 mail which prompted me to write this mail. I'd really like to be able to\r
68 join messages in a case like this.\r
69 \r
70 -- \r
71 - Marten\r