1 Return-Path: <teythoon@jade-hamburg.de>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF458429E25
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:38:29 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id MmUEIPixLRxB for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:38:29 -0800 (PST)
\r
17 Received: from mail.cryptobitch.de (cryptobitch.de [88.198.7.68])
\r
18 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
19 (No client certificate requested)
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B026431FB6
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:38:29 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from mail.jade-hamburg.de (unknown [85.183.11.228])
\r
23 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
24 (No client certificate requested)
\r
25 by mail.cryptobitch.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CD7E5102CA
\r
26 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:38:26 +0100 (CET)
\r
27 Received: by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix, from userid 401)
\r
28 id 926CDDF2A2; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:38:25 +0100 (CET)
\r
29 Received: from thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de (unknown
\r
30 [IPv6:fe80::216:d3ff:fe3e:5058%br0])
\r
31 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
\r
32 (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: teythoon)
\r
33 by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B0A3DF29F;
\r
34 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:38:19 +0100 (CET)
\r
35 Received: from teythoon by thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de with local (Exim 4.77)
\r
36 (envelope-from <teythoon@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>)
\r
37 id 1RdHgn-0001am-Ce; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:38:17 +0100
\r
38 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4673874624723661942=="
\r
40 References: <E1RamIG-0003si-K3@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>
\r
41 <4ee8d62a.596ee30a.1833.ffffc33e@mx.google.com>
\r
42 <E1RcdyR-0003Vn-Ny@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>
\r
43 <87k45so36b.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
44 To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
\r
45 Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@googlemail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
46 In-Reply-To: <87k45so36b.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
47 From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
\r
48 Subject: Re: [afew] announcing afew,
\r
49 an universal tagging solution with some fancy features
\r
50 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:38:17 +0100
\r
51 Message-Id: <E1RdHgn-0001am-Ce@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>
\r
52 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
53 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
55 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
56 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
57 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
58 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
59 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
60 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
61 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
62 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
63 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
64 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 08:38:30 -0000
\r
66 --===============4673874624723661942==
\r
67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
\r
69 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
\r
73 Quoting Jameson Graef Rollins (2011-12-19 18:57:00)
\r
74 >On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:13:51 +0100, Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-=
\r
76 >> Is your new tag called 'is:new'? Mine is just called 'new'
\r
78 >is: is a search prefix, synonymous with tag:
\r
80 Ah, thanks for the clarification.
\r
82 >> That could be a problem since 'new' as tag for new mails is currently
\r
83 >> hardcoded at various locations. I thought it was universally accepted,
\r
84 >> but then again hardcoding these things is obviously a bad practice...
\r
86 >Tags for new messages is configurable with the new.tags config setting.
\r
87 >If you're program needs to know that setting, I suggest it retrieve it
\r
88 >From the notmuch config directly ("notmuch config get new.tags").
\r
90 That's a nice touch, it's implemented now :)
\r
94 --===============4673874624723661942==
\r
95 Content-Type: application/octet-stream
\r
97 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
\r
98 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".signature"
\r
100 bG92ZSB1IGFsb3QgQCxACgo=
\r
102 --===============4673874624723661942==--
\r