1 Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0172C431FAE
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id U6aYSE1gx5JZ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
\r
18 Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com (mail-lb0-f170.google.com
\r
19 [209.85.217.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
\r
20 (No client certificate requested)
\r
21 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B9D431FAF
\r
22 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
\r
23 Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r10so5393701lbi.15
\r
24 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
\r
26 h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
\r
27 :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
\r
28 bh=xtRpzC0rcGqY+vqVrs77unhRdCQEKgmduZCZm+mHmDg=;
\r
29 b=k3bT5RLjuzhSlcVkO7D/yB36GWA/i2ro8rfBLVWryUvfjnJ0XMjc67Q1Fhro+bXFDx
\r
30 A/sTfzBSHrCf00AYe7mhmlu0ty9ExOPoDmXBMHqPE7mVHCw1HplqBwkdXAwHAewSMXZc
\r
31 ozytKtLs7GIO1B9cNVeQU2M8LIduqeQXsjnrWKbvo3HvWeGZo56+X7LfDvuAGYfbnc2l
\r
32 nz98mxkOcqO8o2FClZD5qG4XTzGx8HNElQDL6QS+Ss3ziiFQgf3ABRozNYFW/I3RY9LM
\r
33 Sle3STblqcpQqTmnFcZl/hw0LARdVKVgucllaJpXJ6/gEYY8kb3nQKZDIcgoV1m0vhk1
\r
36 X-Received: by 10.112.154.98 with SMTP id vn2mr25899815lbb.8.1367258276851;
\r
37 Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
\r
38 Received: by 10.114.83.167 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
\r
39 In-Reply-To: <871u9twrj2.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
40 References: <1365031678-25188-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
41 <87y5clte1j.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
42 <CAMP44s07KeL4uAChs3KFiqwcsCwWTvni6MzFGzXNeO7=sd6U6Q@mail.gmail.com>
\r
43 <87wqs4rsjm.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
44 <CAMP44s2RuAGjJV089swpjwG9i5X=sARPYve6XZPyK7X7QwZBDg@mail.gmail.com>
\r
45 <878v48om5u.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
46 <CAMP44s3x0m-KUN6aND71SHbBWz6S_23ZcQ-mcT+qxVtEdU+-5w@mail.gmail.com>
\r
47 <87a9oiw2pc.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
48 <CAMP44s3Qyc4mNx=MotX5vUKo-xpj0fj9Qmcoidpe3AKjbjV9_Q@mail.gmail.com>
\r
49 <871u9twrj2.fsf@zancas.localnet>
\r
50 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:57:56 -0500
\r
52 <CAMP44s1DeLT76kTro85cm-vCAkiMUuYdcjFM3xQiUFtvXSVk_Q@mail.gmail.com>
\r
53 Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings
\r
54 From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
\r
55 To: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
\r
56 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
\r
57 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Carl Worth <cworth@debian.org>
\r
58 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
59 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
61 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
62 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
63 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
64 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
65 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
66 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
67 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
68 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
69 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
70 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:58:05 -0000
\r
72 On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:38 AM, David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> wrote:
\r
73 > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
\r
75 >> I don't take it personally, I just don't see why a part of the project
\r
76 >> has to be treated differently because you (the debian packager), don't
\r
77 >> want to setup a separate git repo where to have this 'live' packaging
\r
78 >> (or even a separate branch).
\r
81 > My hypothetical laziness is not the reason. It was at the strong
\r
82 > insistence of Carl that things are organized this way.
\r
84 I still don't see why we need to do that. The notmuch project
\r
85 shouldn't be bound to the debian project.
\r