1 Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F238431FD0
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:38:23 -0800 (PST)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
\r
13 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled
\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
15 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
16 with ESMTP id bI62yF+JqF3h for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
17 Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:38:21 -0800 (PST)
\r
18 Received: from homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcahe.dreamhost.com
\r
20 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93462431FB6
\r
21 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:38:21 -0800 (PST)
\r
22 Received: from homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
23 by homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AF4250069;
\r
24 Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:38:19 -0800 (PST)
\r
25 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject
\r
26 :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
\r
27 content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=HS/qw8wFsfo6RjLWPQ2Eiw5sOAf
\r
28 ac5cJKbWm/S+ppD5vMu+duNLqXnhHd6FMJAQ6vwU7aNsdyBBC2Z0ZbMCu07tO918
\r
29 MzwTpkzfZj3Z+WiLiIbi7a/JL+8Y3cRtnVbG05QWfI3eAeHXcshzanzc8p13/a0x
\r
31 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to
\r
32 :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
\r
33 content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=UyQKDO3Wx+EIle5l5ykmUwb1Pa0=; b=F
\r
34 lVoPWeHOWAG7T2syxnfwJ+v4bU6sJYUIDxWWiZchDJldXbbaKpzZ8kjLSfJboZnf
\r
35 Imu/Pu85WjPcyH+fzerZwMqJhRJWKF4/ZTypH4NrDegQYcpLikObsSpRyYLT2nrp
\r
36 aiy++YmAlSN621Fp3xk4Kh/x9+PBY52hboTE+AWJak=
\r
37 Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (unknown [84.55.209.24])
\r
38 (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de)
\r
39 by homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 536F2250058;
\r
40 Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:38:15 -0800 (PST)
\r
41 Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
\r
42 Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:38:02 +0100
\r
43 From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r
44 To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
\r
45 notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
46 Subject: Re: PGP/MIME signature verification
\r
47 In-Reply-To: <4D10C97C.7060602@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
48 References: <4CF15D67.1070904@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
49 <87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
\r
50 <87zkrz314j.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <4D10C97C.7060602@fifthhorseman.net>
\r
51 User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-58-g9741d28 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1
\r
52 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
\r
53 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:38:02 +0100
\r
54 Message-ID: <87mxnx3mb9.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
\r
56 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
61 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
63 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
68 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
69 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:38:23 -0000
\r
71 > yes, the branch as it stands just concerns itself with the notmuch binary.
\r
75 > > "sigstatus": [{"status": "error","keyid": "ED34CEABE27BAABC", "errors":
\r
77 > > (perhaps due to me not having your key???)
\r
79 > yup, that is why you get that error.
\r
81 Is there a possibility to squeeze a nicer error message out of it? :-)
\r
84 > > notmuch show --verify id:"87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net"
\r
86 > > neither omplains nor shows anything in addition. Should it do one of the
\r
89 > the patch is specifically only for the json output. If you'd like the
\r
90 > same features for the non-json output, that would be cool to see, but i
\r
91 > don't understand those formats well enough to know how to incude that
\r
92 > kind of info in them.
\r
94 No problem, I was just wondering about it simply silently ignoring an
\r
95 option (in plain output), but that is fine for now.
\r
97 > If this seems like i've only done one small corner of the task needed to
\r
98 > get signature verification: you're right!
\r
100 NONONO :) Don't misunderestimate me. This is phantastic work!!!
\r
102 You got the really hard part working, which is great. The rest is sugar
\r
103 on top :). Much appreciated and another:
\r
105 Tested-and-approved-and-+1for_merging: S. Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
\r