1 Return-Path: <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
\r
5 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8175F4196F2
\r
6 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
\r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
\r
12 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
\r
13 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
\r
14 by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
\r
15 with ESMTP id GzXDSmVi540Q for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
\r
16 Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
\r
17 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])
\r
18 by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7D8431FC1
\r
19 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
\r
20 Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])
\r
21 by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75B219F33CB;
\r
22 Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:35:34 +0200 (CEST)
\r
23 X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS
\r
24 Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])
\r
25 by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,
\r
27 with ESMTP id TAQvzTopBREl; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:35:33 +0200 (CEST)
\r
28 Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])
\r
29 by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D1519F330D;
\r
30 Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:35:33 +0200 (CEST)
\r
31 Received: from steelpick.2x.cz (k335-30.felk.cvut.cz [147.32.86.30])
\r
32 (Authenticated sender: sojkam1)
\r
33 by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16594FA003;
\r
34 Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:35:33 +0200 (CEST)
\r
35 Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.71)
\r
36 (envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>)
\r
37 id 1O1y4K-0003bt-Ui; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:35:32 +0200
\r
38 From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
\r
39 To: Servilio Afre Puentes <servilio@gmail.com>,
\r
40 notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
41 Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: when archiving move the cursor depending on the
\r
43 In-Reply-To: <x2wb22065d01004130604j5f71d3c4g191d9eb4109c324@mail.gmail.com>
\r
44 References: <x2wb22065d01004130604j5f71d3c4g191d9eb4109c324@mail.gmail.com>
\r
45 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:35:32 +0200
\r
46 Message-ID: <874ojea0tn.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
\r
48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
\r
49 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
\r
50 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
\r
52 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
\r
53 <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
\r
54 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
\r
55 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
\r
56 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
\r
57 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
\r
58 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
\r
59 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
\r
60 <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
\r
61 X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:35:36 -0000
\r
63 On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Servilio Afre Puentes wrote:
\r
64 > The current hardcoded behaviour will not take you to the next unread
\r
65 > thread when the sort order is set to newer-first from the default of
\r
68 Is this really what we want? If I sort messages by newest first, it
\r
69 menas that I want to process my emails from the newest to the oldest.
\r
70 I'm satisfied with the current behavour.
\r