Re: [PATCH] emacs: wash: make word-wrap bound message width
[notmuch-archives.git] / 14 / 20924e9902e6d19787bf4425f205bbb11aa917
1 Return-Path: <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
2 X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
3 Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
4 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])\r
5         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2164431FB6\r
6         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 20:57:30 -0700 (PDT)\r
7 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org\r
8 X-Spam-Flag: NO\r
9 X-Spam-Score: -0.799\r
10 X-Spam-Level: \r
11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5\r
12         tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,\r
13         FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled\r
14 Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])\r
15         by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)\r
16         with ESMTP id yHIL8SaI2mjp for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;\r
17         Sat, 22 Jun 2013 20:57:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
18 Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com (mail-pa0-f50.google.com\r
19         [209.85.220.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))\r
20         (No client certificate requested)\r
21         by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CE82431FAE\r
22         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 20:57:23 -0700 (PDT)\r
23 Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id fb1so9439906pad.23\r
24         for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 20:57:22 -0700 (PDT)\r
25 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;\r
26         h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references\r
27         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition\r
28         :content-transfer-encoding;\r
29         bh=W3GTm0BNPyg1hY77/NnMyccF7BwKsmisV6Lr7YJEVcU=;\r
30         b=NnBNCof6rKbzV8IQgzVew4yttyFx/MfjlTym72QQ81Z7Tv6fQPGjul0y9AWbRR+AYC\r
31         bZ3kFha/3nY3IELPW5YpbptJ6wvMtJTxJgo0iwg42pvMCxZ7VmKs+XhBQc9qLzbUM7Io\r
32         1bNJPuHjaEjlJUxTmqoM3OWQ0E/FP+kqzdiRfSH61Iqa9IdPNiOtkI7okQonyEGdUVJL\r
33         Uou14+h6JfAHar9D4qkRh2jd0TOUc4ydJop5s9uSQAUVAALnRjvxpIaYJuqVJpaoEpoB\r
34         Roou8T6+Tf7tG3HsZH74z/mhMbpV6nISBO1rSplHkpujThQU5i/8a8dvQzJWF8/wesFv\r
35         vWcw==\r
36 X-Received: by 10.66.232.9 with SMTP id tk9mr22366349pac.20.1371959841473;\r
37         Sat, 22 Jun 2013 20:57:21 -0700 (PDT)\r
38 Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au.\r
39         [220.233.42.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id\r
40         dj5sm11757558pbc.25.2013.06.22.20.57.18 for <multiple recipients>\r
41         (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);\r
42         Sat, 22 Jun 2013 20:57:20 -0700 (PDT)\r
43 Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 13:57:27 +1000\r
44 Message-ID: <20130623135727.GA6190@hili.localdomain>\r
45 From: Peter Wang <novalazy@gmail.com>\r
46 To: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>\r
47 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/12] cli: add insert command\r
48 In-Reply-To: <87hagqvb4n.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
49 References: <1371880008-18312-1-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
50         <1371880008-18312-4-git-send-email-novalazy@gmail.com>\r
51         <87hagqvb4n.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>\r
52 MIME-Version: 1.0\r
53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\r
54 Content-Disposition: inline\r
55 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\r
56 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
57 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org\r
58 X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13\r
59 Precedence: list\r
60 List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."\r
61         <notmuch.notmuchmail.org>\r
62 List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,\r
63         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>\r
64 List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>\r
65 List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>\r
66 List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>\r
67 List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,\r
68         <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>\r
69 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 03:57:31 -0000\r
70 \r
71 On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 08:48:56 +0100, Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com> wrote:\r
72\r
73 > I think I would like the option to have the command fail if it doesn't\r
74 > get added to the database. If, for example, the command is used to\r
75 > postpone a message it may be very difficult/impossible to find it\r
76 > without the postponed tag that I asked for.\r
77\r
78 > Could we have a --fail-on-index-fail cli option which says which\r
79 > behaviour we want? It is a little ugly but I think different users will\r
80 > want different behaviour and there is a risk of dataloss in either case.\r
81 \r
82 I would like that option, too (not sure about the name).  It can be\r
83 added after at least the first few patches in the series are pushed.\r
84 \r
85 Peter\r